2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-017-0328-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Atmospheric Boundary-Layer Electrical Variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, there can be an increase in the space charge, which is accumulating at the top of the planetary boundary layer (Nicoll et al, 2018). The mentioned processes can result in an increase of the atmospheric electric field of approximately 10-100 V/m (Anisimov et al, 2018). Furthermore, some authors reported a sharp increase of the AEF beginning shortly after the sunrise, which is known as the 'sunrise effect'.…”
Section: Effect Of Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there can be an increase in the space charge, which is accumulating at the top of the planetary boundary layer (Nicoll et al, 2018). The mentioned processes can result in an increase of the atmospheric electric field of approximately 10-100 V/m (Anisimov et al, 2018). Furthermore, some authors reported a sharp increase of the AEF beginning shortly after the sunrise, which is known as the 'sunrise effect'.…”
Section: Effect Of Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The short lifetime of 220 Rn leads to the fact that all 220 Rn entering the atmosphere decays in its nearsurface layer, in contrast to the relatively long-lived 222 Rn, which has time to spread within the entire atmospheric boundary layer. Thus, the contribution of 220 Rn to ionization of the near-surface atmosphere can be quite significant, even despite its low efflux from the soil surface [10]. At the same time, the short lifetime of 220 Rn requires a special approach to measure its volumetric activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was obtained from the hourly average of PG measurements made over the world's ocean and represents the global daily contribution of the electrical activity in disturbed regions (Whipple, 1929;Peterson et al, 2017). However, PG measurements on the ground are highly variable due to different local factors, such as pollution (Harrison and Aplin, 2002;Silva et al, 2014), precipitation, convective processes in the planetary boundary layer (Anisimov et al, 2018), and changes in ionisation rate from the ambient radioactivity of the Earth's surface (Barbosa, 2020). Some of these local effects can be reduced by making PG measurements at high latitudes, where the measurement sites are far from large human populations, and the low surface temperatures, and lack of daylight conditions during certain months, inhibit daytime convection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%