2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-20612013005000056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the BAX® system for the detection of Salmonella spp. in naturally contaminated chicken meat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other methodologies have been developed to reduce the possibility of contamination or error during PCR, such as the USDA‐FSIS‐approved BAX® (Wasilenko and others ) system, which consists of only 1 inoculation step. (Bailey ; Shearer and others ; Frausto and others ).…”
Section: Molecular Methods For Stec Identificationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Other methodologies have been developed to reduce the possibility of contamination or error during PCR, such as the USDA‐FSIS‐approved BAX® (Wasilenko and others ) system, which consists of only 1 inoculation step. (Bailey ; Shearer and others ; Frausto and others ).…”
Section: Molecular Methods For Stec Identificationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Rapid molecular-based methodologies, such as real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), are alternatives that can improve the accuracy and efficiency of SE testing and confirmation [13][14][15][16][17]. Unlike the traditional Salmonella culture-based approaches, several investigations have shown that qPCR methods provide superior efficiency and specificity in detecting SE in a variety of food matrices, including shell eggs [16,18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%