1999
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.52.3.225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the BBL Crystal MRSA ID System for detection of oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Abstract: (J Clin Pathol 1999;52:225-227)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As multiresistant nosocomial pathogens of high epidemiological interest (i.e., vancomycin-resistant S. aureus ) were not kept, further diagnostic validation could not be conducted. Differences in the sensitivity and specificity of laboratory diagnostic techniques have been described, which might impact on stain identification [23]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As multiresistant nosocomial pathogens of high epidemiological interest (i.e., vancomycin-resistant S. aureus ) were not kept, further diagnostic validation could not be conducted. Differences in the sensitivity and specificity of laboratory diagnostic techniques have been described, which might impact on stain identification [23]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 shows the basic techniques, steps of performance, need for using the patients' samples directly or the primary culture, the equipment required, and the time needed to obtain results of the current methods used for identification of MRSA/MSSA and our new method. [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Our method is based on the growth rate difference of S. aureus in two environments, with or without oxacillin. MRSA and MSSA grow at similar rates in normal media, however MSSA grows significantly slower than MRSA in presence of oxacillin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in the sensitivity and specificity have been described [28-30] which may have an impact on the identification of a MRSA patient. But it is unlikely to have an impact on the result of the antiseptic treatment because the method would have been the same before and after treatment of the same patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%