2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the blocking effect of retaining walls on groundwater seepage in aquifers with different insertion depths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, because of existing underground structures, groundwater in a hydrostatic pressure condition may change into a condition with an unsteady downward flow. Because of the cut-off effect of underground works, the steady flow in aquifers changes into turbulent flow, which makes the groundwater head around the bottom of underground structures lower than that around the top [41][42][43].…”
Section: Long-term Drawdown Of Groundwatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, because of existing underground structures, groundwater in a hydrostatic pressure condition may change into a condition with an unsteady downward flow. Because of the cut-off effect of underground works, the steady flow in aquifers changes into turbulent flow, which makes the groundwater head around the bottom of underground structures lower than that around the top [41][42][43].…”
Section: Long-term Drawdown Of Groundwatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dewatering-retaining systems employed in Shanghai can be divided into the following five patterns, according to the insertion depth of the retaining wall into an aquifer (Wu, 2003;Xu et al, 2014): i) Pattern 1: the retaining walls are shallowly buried in AdI and the wells are set in the foundation pit to drain the phreatic water; ii) Pattern 2: the retaining wall extends into AdI and the thickness between the base of the foundation pit and the top of Aq I is small. Some wells are set in the pit to drain the phreatic water, and others are set outside the pit to lower the groundwater head of AqI; iii) Pattern 3: the retaining wall enters the upper part of AqI, and wells are set both inside and outside the pit; iv) Pattern 4: the retaining wall extends almost fully into of AqI, and wells are set within the foundation pit to withdraw the phreatic water as well as the confined water; and v) Pattern 5: the retaining wall cuts off AqI completely, and wells are set within the foundation pit to withdraw both phreatic water and confined water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of diaphragm walls is limited because of high project costs and engineering difficulties. However, several researchers have adopted this measure in the projects with shallow groundwater level for controlling the water influx into the foundation pit [9][10][11][12]. The second measure of installing pumping wells has been widely used to lower the groundwater table in open pits [13][14][15], and this measure has often been used in conjunction with a diaphragm wall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%