2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.03.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the CALINE4 and CAR-FMI models against measurements near a major road

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
39
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of them specifically focus on dispersion modeling under low-speed wind conditions [111][112][113]. Levitin et al evaluated the performance of CALINE4 and CAR-FMI models in modeling NO 2 and NO x dispersion near a major road [114]. Vardoulakis et al reviewed four of Gaussian-based dispersion models in street canyons [100].…”
Section: Dispersion Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them specifically focus on dispersion modeling under low-speed wind conditions [111][112][113]. Levitin et al evaluated the performance of CALINE4 and CAR-FMI models in modeling NO 2 and NO x dispersion near a major road [114]. Vardoulakis et al reviewed four of Gaussian-based dispersion models in street canyons [100].…”
Section: Dispersion Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karppinen et al, 2000b;Kousa et al, 2001;Hellén et al, 2005) and for PM 2.5 (Kauhaniemi et al, 2008;Sokhi et al, 2008;Singh et al, 2014). The performance of the CAR-FMI model has also been evaluated against the results of a field measurement campaign and other roadside dispersion models Öttl et al, 2001;Levitin et al, 2005). The UDM-FMI has been evaluated against the measured data of urban measurement networks in Helsinki Metropolitan Area (Karppinen et al, 2000b;Kousa et al, 2001) and the tracer experiments of Kincaid, Copenhagen and Lilleström.…”
Section: Dispersion Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For model evaluation, air quality data have to be combined with simultaneous measurements of traffic flow and meteorological parameters as well as information about local topography and buildings (Luhar and Patil, 1989;Benson, 1992;Kukkonen et al, 2001;Oettl et al, 2001;Tiitta et al, 2002;Levitin et al, 2005). Evaluation of roadside dispersion models is seriously hindered by the scarcity of appropriate good-quality experimental datasets (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%