1999
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.37.7.2183-2188.1999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Discriminatory Power of Typing Methods forNeisseria gonorrhoeae

Abstract: A panel of 18 strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, known to be temporally and geographically diverse, was used to evaluate a number of typing systems, including conventional auxotyping and serotyping and the molecular methods of arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR), amplified ribosomal-DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA), opa typing, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). The discriminatory power of the different typing methods were determined with a collection of 87 clinical isolates from commercial sex workers in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to these results PFGE fingerprinting is a sharper and more discriminating epidemiologic tool than the routinely used serological typing. This is in full agreement with previous studies [82,83,87].…”
Section: Typing Methodssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to these results PFGE fingerprinting is a sharper and more discriminating epidemiologic tool than the routinely used serological typing. This is in full agreement with previous studies [82,83,87].…”
Section: Typing Methodssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…From each suspension 300 µL was used for preparation and digestion of the genomic DNA of the bacteria according to the manufacturer's protocol of GenePath Group 3 Reagent Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Two different restriction enzymes were separately used: SpeI recommended by Bio-Rad and used in previous studies [82][83][84][85][86] and BglII also used in previous studies [86,87].…”
Section: Genetic Characterisation By Pfgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the overall discriminative power of the designed method was low. The actin gene may not be a suitable marker for strain discrimination if it is used on its own, but the overall discriminative power can be improved if a combination of markers for strain discrimination is used [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to recent guidelines [17,20,43], a typing system should achieve a DI of >0.95 for reliable assessment of the clonal relatedness of isolates or, if typing results are to be interpreted with confidence, a DI of greater than 0.90 is desirable [20,44,45].…”
Section: Discriminatory Power Of Rapdmentioning
confidence: 99%