2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0273-1177(02)00800-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the dynamic cutoff rigidity model using dosimetry data from the STS-28 flight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison between the computed and measured dose rate is given in Figure 4. A more detailed description of these results are given by Smart and Shea (2002) and Smart et al (2003).…”
Section: Comparisons Using Cutoff Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison between the computed and measured dose rate is given in Figure 4. A more detailed description of these results are given by Smart and Shea (2002) and Smart et al (2003).…”
Section: Comparisons Using Cutoff Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the literature also reports that the cutoff latitude predicted by either the Smart et al . [] or the updated Smart and Shea [] model shows good agreement with measurement‐derived cutoff latitudes for Kp ≤ 5, with the model deviating equatorward for larger Kp [ Smart et al ., ; Rodger et al ., ; Clilverd et al ., ]. Neal et al .…”
Section: Review Of Pca Modeling Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[], Smart et al . [], and Neal et al . [] all show that geomagnetic cutoff latitude, which is the minimum latitude to which a solar proton of a particular energy will precipitate, tracks well with geomagnetic activity.…”
Section: Review Of Pca Modeling Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equator‐ward of the cutoff, no protons below the same given energy precipitate. Rigidity cutoffs are not static and vary with geomagnetic activity [ Smart et al , 2003; Rodger et al , 2006]. However, cutoff position and dynamics (on time scales of hours or less) are inherently difficult to measure or model for a specific case.…”
Section: January 2005 Sep Event Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%