2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03795-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the efficacy of perineal urethrostomy for patients with anterior urethral stricture: insights from surgical and patient-reported outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority (84.6%) of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the surgery outcome. This study reported an improvement in subjective symptoms (questionnaires) and objective measures of urination [12] . The higher recurrence rate in our study versus the aforementioned study (22.6% vs 7.1%) is probably related to the longer median follow-up of our patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The majority (84.6%) of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the surgery outcome. This study reported an improvement in subjective symptoms (questionnaires) and objective measures of urination [12] . The higher recurrence rate in our study versus the aforementioned study (22.6% vs 7.1%) is probably related to the longer median follow-up of our patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…On the other hand, PU is a viable option with a high success rate for patients with highly complicated stricture, those who do not opt for urethroplasty, those for whom urethroplasty is not possible due to comorbidities, and those who do not have hesitancy with sitting urination 28 . In previous HSUS series, it has been reported that 4.7%–11.9% of patients underwent PU 8,11–13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%