2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2020.01.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the gas absorption performance of a flow-type hydrate-based gas uptake system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, although the rate of hydrate growth in a stirred tank is an issue, 4 the volumetric mass transfer coefficient with hydrate formation in a bubble column is more than 10 times that without the hydrate formation. 22 If the pressure is increased to promote absorption, then higher mass flow rates are required to obtain the same volumetric gas flow rate, increasing compression costs. For the case of increasing the pressure by 1 MPa, that is, from 5 to 6 MPa, CO 2 gas consumption is equivalent to decreasing the temperature by 2 K (from 278 to 276 K).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, although the rate of hydrate growth in a stirred tank is an issue, 4 the volumetric mass transfer coefficient with hydrate formation in a bubble column is more than 10 times that without the hydrate formation. 22 If the pressure is increased to promote absorption, then higher mass flow rates are required to obtain the same volumetric gas flow rate, increasing compression costs. For the case of increasing the pressure by 1 MPa, that is, from 5 to 6 MPa, CO 2 gas consumption is equivalent to decreasing the temperature by 2 K (from 278 to 276 K).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, bubble columns can be expected to form hydrates more efficiently than hydrates formed at a horizontal gas–liquid interface. In fact, although the rate of hydrate growth in a stirred tank is an issue, the volumetric mass transfer coefficient with hydrate formation in a bubble column is more than 10 times that without the hydrate formation . If the pressure is increased to promote absorption, then higher mass flow rates are required to obtain the same volumetric gas flow rate, increasing compression costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%