2003
DOI: 10.1093/japr/12.2.229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Growth Potential, Carcass Components and Meat Quality Characteristics of Three Commercial Strains of Tom Turkeys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
10
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast with Roberson et al (2003) who did not observe differences in share of thighs between different turkey strains. Higher (P <0.001) share of thigh was found in males (29.84 %) than in females (27.45 %).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is in contrast with Roberson et al (2003) who did not observe differences in share of thighs between different turkey strains. Higher (P <0.001) share of thigh was found in males (29.84 %) than in females (27.45 %).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…The results are consistent with Roberson et al (2003) who did not detect differences between turkey strains at 16 or 18 week of age. On the other hand, Werner et al (2008) found significant differences in different turkey hybrids.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the past, turkey was regarded as a once a year treat but nowadays more and more people are aware of turkey's low cost and low fat (10% fat) compared to red meat and are making it a part of their regular diet (Castro Ferreira, et al, 2000). Moreover, meat obtained from turkeys is an excellent protein source and has a good price-quality ratio (Roberson, et al, 2003). In addition, in modern dietary trends, consumption of turkey meat is indicated as an adequate source of essential unsaturated fatty acids (Antony, et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%