2006
DOI: 10.1175/jcli3831.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Hydrological Cycle in the ECHAM5 Model

Abstract: This study investigates the impact of model resolution on the hydrological cycle in a suite of model simulations using a new version of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM). Special attention is paid to the evaluation of precipitation on the regional scale by comparing model simulations with observational data in a number of catchments representing the major river systems on the earth in different climate zones. It is found that an increased vertical resolution,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
152
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
20
152
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Atmospheric simulations were carried out using ECHAM5-wiso , which is the isotope-enabled version of the atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5 (Roeckner et al, 2003;Hagemann et al, 2006;Roeckner et al, 2006). The model considers both stable water isotopes H 18 2 O and HDO, which have been explicitly implemented into its hydrological cycle, analogous to the isotope modelling approach used in the previous model versions ECHAM3 (Hoffmann et al, 1998) and ECHAM4 (e.g.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atmospheric simulations were carried out using ECHAM5-wiso , which is the isotope-enabled version of the atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5 (Roeckner et al, 2003;Hagemann et al, 2006;Roeckner et al, 2006). The model considers both stable water isotopes H 18 2 O and HDO, which have been explicitly implemented into its hydrological cycle, analogous to the isotope modelling approach used in the previous model versions ECHAM3 (Hoffmann et al, 1998) and ECHAM4 (e.g.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) Improvements in the treatment of humidity in ERAInterim compared with ERA-40 significantly reduced the overestimation of precipitation discussed in Hagemann et al (2005), particularly over the tropical oceans, with associated latent heating and circulation changes (Simmons et al, 2007). (iii) Improvements in the representation of the stratosphere resulted in a more realistic age of air in the stratosphere in ERA-Interim and also increased agreement with observations of stratospheric humidity and temperature.…”
Section: The Era Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, location and geometry of the Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), and distribution and time evolution of divergence in the tropics are different among the reanalyses (Newman et al 2000). In the latest ECMWF reanalysis ERA-40, in which satellite data were maximally assimilated, excess precipitation appeared in the tropics, which seemed to be caused by problems Bengtsson et al 2004b;Hagemann et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%