1979
DOI: 10.1520/jte10222j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of theJIntegral for the Compact Specimen

Abstract: Methods for determining the J integral from an experimental load versus load point displacement curve for the compact specimen are discussed. The original analysis by Merkle and Corten, which accounted for the tension component in the compact specimen, is presented along with a simplified version (of the analysis) that is shown to be essentially equivalent to the original formulation. Based on experimental results from Landes, Walker, and Clarke, a further simplified expression is recommended as the best expre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where J el and J pl are the elastic and plastic component of the J-integral, respectively; K is the stress-intensity factor, which represents the magnitude of the ideal crack-tip stress field (stress-field singularity) for a particular mode in a homogeneous, linear elastic body; ν and E is Poisson's ratio and the elastic modulus, respectively; A pl is the plastic area under the load-displacement curve; η pl is the geometry factor, dependent on a/W. For the compact specimen, Clarke and Landes obtained an approximate fitted function of η pl (= 2 + 0.522b 0 /W) [44]. B N is the net specimen thickness.…”
Section: Fracture Mechanics Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where J el and J pl are the elastic and plastic component of the J-integral, respectively; K is the stress-intensity factor, which represents the magnitude of the ideal crack-tip stress field (stress-field singularity) for a particular mode in a homogeneous, linear elastic body; ν and E is Poisson's ratio and the elastic modulus, respectively; A pl is the plastic area under the load-displacement curve; η pl is the geometry factor, dependent on a/W. For the compact specimen, Clarke and Landes obtained an approximate fitted function of η pl (= 2 + 0.522b 0 /W) [44]. B N is the net specimen thickness.…”
Section: Fracture Mechanics Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For compact tension (CT) specimens, ASTM has adopted an expression (eqn. 1) as obtained by Landes and Clarke [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, in [6][7][8], various researchers used the C(T) specimen to assess the cracking phenomena and fracture toughness of various materials. In scientific papers [9][10][11], the development of research methods, as well as the need for calibration used in experimental designs, were discussed by authors to define the method of determining critical fracture toughness values based on C(T) specimens. In [12] presented in 2012, Zhu and Joyce discussed an overview of methods for determining fracture toughness using the C(T) and SEN(B) specimens, alongside the C(T) geometry, indicating the need to consider the influence of geometric constraints in formulas approximating the equations of the J-R curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%