2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the ICD-10 system in coding revascularisation procedures in patients with peripheral arterial disease in England: a retrospective cohort study using national administrative and clinical databases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
4

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, it was not possible to account for the severity of PAD and other potentially relevant variables, such as smoking and ethnicity, as these are not well documented in the ICD-10 diagnosis codes used in HES. However, the selection of ICD-10 codes used to define the cohort and the side of the procedure were informed by a previous study 37 comparing coding between HES and NVR databases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it was not possible to account for the severity of PAD and other potentially relevant variables, such as smoking and ethnicity, as these are not well documented in the ICD-10 diagnosis codes used in HES. However, the selection of ICD-10 codes used to define the cohort and the side of the procedure were informed by a previous study 37 comparing coding between HES and NVR databases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zbog mogućnosti sustavno pogrešne klasifikacije među bolnicama u smislu odabira dijagnoza i radi veće kliničke utemeljenosti, dva liječnika specijalista, interventni radiolog iz Kliničke bolnice Dubrava i internist kardiolog iz Kliničkog bolničkog centra Zagreb, iz bolničkih informacijskih sustava navedenih ustanova odabrali su dijagnoze koje se primjenjuju u kodiranju PAB-a te interventnih i dijagnostičkih postupaka u takvih bolesnika. 14 Navedene su dijagnoze dopunjene dijagnozama koje su iskorištene u drugim istraživanjima. 15 U konačnici, iz Baze umrlih Hrvatskog zavoda za javno zdravstvo za razdoblje od 2011. do 2020. godine dobiveni su podatci po petogodišnjim dobnim skupinama od 0 do 85+, spolu i županijama za sljedeće dijagnoze 16,17 (tablica 1).…”
Section: Materijali I Metode Izvori Podatakaunclassified
“…Due to systemic misclassification bias between hospitals with regard to choosing the diagnosis and in order to achieve higher clinical reliability, two specialist physicians, namely an interventional radiologist from the Dubrava Clinical Hospital and an internist cardiologist from the University Hospital Centre Zagreb, were engaged to examine hospital information systems and choose the diagnoses that are applied in coding PAD as well as the interventional and diagnostic procedures used in these patients. 14 These diagnoses were supplemented by diagnoses used in other studies. 15 Finally, the Mortality Database of the Croatian Institute of Public Health was used to collect data for the period from 2011 to 2020, stratified by five-year age groups for patients between the ages of 0 and 85+, as well as by sex and by county (Table 1).…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, data on disease outcomes from population scale biobanks are only available through recorded ICD-10 billing codes or self-reported diagnosis [1][2][3] . While these datasets have provided invaluable insights into the genetic basis of disease, case ascertainment based solely on information available in the EHR or from self-reports can be biased by a multitude of factors including differences in how patients were billed 4 , differential diagnosis due to assessment by clinicians (non-specialist vs specialist) 5 , or differences in classification or diagnosis based on disease severity 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%