Evaluation of the Impact of C2X Systems to the Accident Severity in Motorcycle Accidents

Billicsich, Sophie; Tomasch, Ernst; Eichberger, Arno; Markovic, Gerald; Magosi, Zoltán Ferenc

doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.228

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For instance, Brijs et al ( 47 ) note that driver age and self-reported aggressive driving were variables that negatively influenced overtaking performance, despite having an in-vehicle collision warning system. A possible explanation lies in the tendency of drivers with these characteristics to ignore or minimize the alerts and warnings provided by the system ( 73 ). Also, drivers who self-identify as aggressive have been found to tend to be more prone to take risks and underestimate the importance of warning signals ( 74 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“Cyclist at 12 o’clock!”: a systematic review of in-vehicle advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) for preventing car-rider crashes

Useche,

Faus,

Alonso

2024

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionWhile Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) have become a prominent topic in road safety research, there has been relatively little discussion about their effectiveness in preventing car collisions involving specific vulnerable road users, such as cyclists. Therefore, the primary objective of this systematic literature review is to analyze the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of in-vehicle ADAS in preventing vehicle collisions with cyclists.MethodsTo achieve this goal, this systematic review analyzed a selection of original research papers that examined the effectiveness of ADAS systems in preventing car-cyclist collisions. The review followed the PRISMA protocol, which led to the extraction of 21 eligible studies from an initial pool of 289 sources indexed in the primary scientific literature databases. Additionally, word community-based content analyses were used to examine the research topics and their links within the current scientific literature on the matter.ResultsAlthough the current number of studies available is still scarce (most sources focus on car-motorcyclist or car-pedestrian crashes), the overall quality of the available studies has been reasonably good, as determined by the selected evaluation methods. In terms of studies’ outcomes, the literature supports the value of in-vehicle ADAS for preventing car-cyclist crashes. However, threatful side effects such as unrealistic expectations of these systems and users’ overconfidence or desensitization are also highlighted, as well as the need to increase driver training and road user awareness.ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that Advanced Driver Assistance Systems have significant potential to contribute to the prevention of driving crashes involving cyclists. However, the literature emphasizes the importance of concurrently enhancing user-related skills in both ADAS use and road-user interaction through educational and training initiatives. Future research should also address emerging issues, such as ADAS-related behavioral ergonomics, and conduct long-term effectiveness assessments of ADAS in preventing car-cycling crashes and their subsequent injuries.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO, unique identifier CRD42024505492, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=505492.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%