2017
DOI: 10.1111/sifp.12027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Nigerian Urban Reproductive Health Initiative (NURHI) Program

Abstract: Gaps remain in understanding whether family planning (FP) programs can change urban women's FP behaviors. Even less is known about what works among poor urban women. This article presents results of the impact evaluation of the Nigerian Urban Reproductive Health Initiative (NURHI). Findings are based on recently collected longitudinal data from women and facilities in six cities in Nigeria. Over the four‐year follow‐up period, there was an increase of about ten percentage points in modern method use. Impact ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is contrasted with studies conducted in Kenya, 20 Tanzania, 17 and Nigeria. 13 The difference may be explained by socioeconomic differences between countries, which matters the quality and quantity of information delivered through different media and sample size differences between studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is contrasted with studies conducted in Kenya, 20 Tanzania, 17 and Nigeria. 13 The difference may be explained by socioeconomic differences between countries, which matters the quality and quantity of information delivered through different media and sample size differences between studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence showed that the provision of targeted, easily accessible, and accurate information about family planning through multiple channels increased the use of modern contraceptives, and influence social norms on its utilization. 13 – 15…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NURHI-1 mid-term and immediate closeout evaluations reported much higher degrees of sustainability compared with findings in the current study conducted about 3 years after NURHI-1 closeout. 24 25 Our findings thus indicate a progressive decline in project activities as the duration from NURHI-1 closeout to time of evaluation increases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The Measurement, Learning & Evaluation (MLE) project undertook the impact evaluation of the NURHI programme; this included baseline, midterm, and endline household and facility-based surveys. 24–26 Post immediate impact effects, it is important to assess the sustainability of the NURHI interventions when funding ends. This informs whether immediate gains are maintained and whether there are longer-term system-level and program-level benefits of the FP programme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Measurement, Learning & Evaluation (MLE) project (also funded by BMGF), conducted the evaluation of the NURHI Phase I program with Data, Research and Mapping Consult (DRMC) and the National Population Commission as the local implementing partners [24]. The MLE project applied a hybrid design, collecting both longitudinal and cross-sectional survey data to evaluate the direct impact of NURHI on contraceptive use and behavioral and attitudinal norms in the six study cities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%