2020
DOI: 10.1186/s40729-020-00209-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis

Abstract: Backgrounds: This study aimed to evaluate the microstructural changes in the peri-implant bone in patients with short implants in terms of implant survival status by using fractal analysis measurements. Results: Dental panoramic radiographs (DPRs) of 67 patients were examined and included in this study. Fractal analysis and measurement of the crown-implant ratio were performed with ImageJ. The fractal analysis measurement was performed on the DPRs obtained at preoperative (FD0) and in the follow-up periods (af… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the complexity of trabecular bone was increased in OS. Other studies using FD analysis revealed that FD was decreased immediately after orthognathic surgery and increased gradually over time 23 and that FD values of the implant success group were significantly higher than those of the failure group 22 . Like the bone-healing process in orthognathic surgery and implant osseointegration, pathological bone-forming diseases, such as OS and OM, demonstrated an increase in FD values in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that the complexity of trabecular bone was increased in OS. Other studies using FD analysis revealed that FD was decreased immediately after orthognathic surgery and increased gradually over time 23 and that FD values of the implant success group were significantly higher than those of the failure group 22 . Like the bone-healing process in orthognathic surgery and implant osseointegration, pathological bone-forming diseases, such as OS and OM, demonstrated an increase in FD values in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The fractal dimension (FD) represents the complexity of the trabecular structure. Measurement of the FD in panoramic radiographs has been applied in various fields, including peri-implant bone assessment, mandibular bone-healing after orthognathic surgery, and trabecular alterations in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw 22 25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, one of the most frequently used methods for the evaluation of the trabecular structure adjacent to the implant is resonance frequency analysis, but this method requires additional equipment ( Simunek et al, 2010 ). Evaluation of trabecular structure with fractal analysis is a subject that has been evaluated many times in recent years and its ease of application is an important advantage ( Kış & Güleryüz Gürbulak, 2020 ; Kulczyk, Czajka-Jakubowska & Przystańska, 2018 ). In a study, fractal analysis values were compared with insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis values, as a result, it was shown that FD gave correlative results with both evaluation methods ( Suer, Yaman & Buyuksarac, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mandelbrot was the first person to use the term “fractal” to describe complex geometric structures [ 7 ]. The complexity of irregular objects may be represented by fractal dimension (FD) as a quantitative outcome [ 8 ]. In the literature, it is stated that the trabecular bone microarchitecture can be evaluated using fractal analysis on digital radiographic images [ 9 ].…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FA on digital radiographs is not affected by alterations of exposure parameters or patient positions [ 10 , 11 ]. In standardized dental radiographs, fractal analysis can be used to detect pathological changes in the bone or to evaluate peri-implant bone[ 8 ].…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%