2005
DOI: 10.1097/00004356-200506000-00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the use of a questionnaire by non-specialists to detect hearing loss in preschool Brazilian children

Abstract: In developing countries there is a lack of trained personnel and testing equipment to facilitate early detection of hearing impairment in children. There is a need to develop a strategic functional model for identification of hearing impairments through a scheme for the optimal utilization of the limited and local resources in the community. A questionnaire offers a low-cost option, specially if it is administered by non-professionals. This study evaluated a parent report questionnaire by non-professionals, to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers developed questionnaires for their study but provided inadequate information on psychometric properties of the instruments. 12,25,30,34,36,47 The instruments gathered information on signs and symptoms of various disorders 25 and qualitative information on a child's social integration into society, 47 attitude of families toward their disabled children, 43,58 hearing ability, 30,34 and availability of human resources to provide service for disabled children. 36 Some of the researchers provided limited information on characteristics of the questionnaires and also compared them to more standard tools.…”
Section: Screening Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some researchers developed questionnaires for their study but provided inadequate information on psychometric properties of the instruments. 12,25,30,34,36,47 The instruments gathered information on signs and symptoms of various disorders 25 and qualitative information on a child's social integration into society, 47 attitude of families toward their disabled children, 43,58 hearing ability, 30,34 and availability of human resources to provide service for disabled children. 36 Some of the researchers provided limited information on characteristics of the questionnaires and also compared them to more standard tools.…”
Section: Screening Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Some of the researchers provided limited information on characteristics of the questionnaires and also compared them to more standard tools. 30,34,36 Little is known about the development of the questionnaires except for the Indonesian adaptation of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale 78 and the scale to measure social integration of children with epilepsy in the Indian context. 47 Table 2 outlines the screening tools that were either validated or adapted by different researchers.…”
Section: Screening Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, the hearing loss found is conductive, generally of a mild degree, which makes identifying it through the questions answered by the parents difficult; once the child reacts to and observes medium/strong-intensity sound, as well as observes verbal language acquisition and development, what turns to suspicion of auditory alteration on the part of the extremely difficult family. Previous studies demonstrated that questionnaires are not considered effective tools for the identification of conductive hearing losses, since they do not differentiate children with or without conductive disorders (25,26) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WHO has recommended the use of questionnaires as an efficient, low-cost alternative for identifying hearing loss among children, particularly in developing countries (2010). This approach was analyzed by Gomes and Lichtig (2005), who evaluated a parent report questionnaire by nonprofessionals to identify hearing loss in preschool children in a poor community in Brazil. They found that the questionnaires matched professional screenings 77 percent of the time, although additional refinements were needed to improve reliability.…”
Section: Hearing Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%