2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the VIIRS ocean color monitoring performance in coastal regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
24
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The intra-channel values of ψ in Figs. 4 and 5 indicate that VIIRS systematically underestimates L WN with respect to MODIS-A, as already reported in Hlaing et al (2013) for a different reprocessing. However, the RMSD values are comparable or even slightly smaller for VIIRS (which, assuming identical absolute uncertainties, is in agreement with smaller mean spectral values of L WN ).…”
Section: Results From L Wn Match-upssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The intra-channel values of ψ in Figs. 4 and 5 indicate that VIIRS systematically underestimates L WN with respect to MODIS-A, as already reported in Hlaing et al (2013) for a different reprocessing. However, the RMSD values are comparable or even slightly smaller for VIIRS (which, assuming identical absolute uncertainties, is in agreement with smaller mean spectral values of L WN ).…”
Section: Results From L Wn Match-upssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The performances of the GRS method applied to Sentinel-2 data are similar to those obtained for the main ocean color satellite missions (MERIS, MODIS, SeaWiFS, VIIRS); which have been assessed using the same reference data provided by the AERONET-OC network (e.g., Mélin et al, 2007;Goyens et al, 2013;Hlaing et al, 2013). Therefore, the GRS method could be considered as a robust one from the point of view of the validation step.…”
Section: Quantitative Validationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The calibration and validation of products from ocean color sensors, especially in dynamic coastal areas, do not usually account for the diurnal changes in ocean color and assume a relatively temporally stable daily product (AE2 h) for calibration procedures. 16 Previous studies using geostationary satellite measurements have found that large changes in bio-optical parameters, such as water-leaving radiance, 17 light attenuation, 18,19 suspended particulate matter, and turbidity, 13,20,21 can occur on diel timescales and can be very significant; therefore, significant biases may be introduced as a result of having only one sample per day. 22 Although the temporal coverage of current geostationary orbiting missions, such as the geostationary ocean color imager (GOCI) vastly improves the sampling frequency of these parameters, the limit of geographic coverage constrains the extent of monitoring diurnal processes on global scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%