2021
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.24510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the xerostomia, taste and smell impairments after Covid-19

Abstract: Background The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of coronavirus disease 19 (Covid-19) on the oral cavity by evaluating the oral findings in the patients who recovered after treatment. Material and Methods This study involved confirmed Covid-19 patients whose treatment completed at least two weeks ago. A questionnaire consist of eight parts was applied to explore the oral findings after Covid-19. Also stimulated salivary flow rate was evaluated with a sali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conceptually, xerostomia represents a subjective sensation of dry mouth, while hyposalivation is the objective sign of reduced salivary flow (Nederfors 2000;Dawes 2004). Most studies included in this updated LSR evaluated xerostomia by simple questionnaires (Biadsee et al 2020;Chen et al 2020;Sinjari et al 2020;Abubakr et al 2021) or validated ones (Fantozzi et al 2020;Freni et al 2020), except for Omezli and Torul (2021), who properly quantified the salivary flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conceptually, xerostomia represents a subjective sensation of dry mouth, while hyposalivation is the objective sign of reduced salivary flow (Nederfors 2000;Dawes 2004). Most studies included in this updated LSR evaluated xerostomia by simple questionnaires (Biadsee et al 2020;Chen et al 2020;Sinjari et al 2020;Abubakr et al 2021) or validated ones (Fantozzi et al 2020;Freni et al 2020), except for Omezli and Torul (2021), who properly quantified the salivary flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xerostomia was a new finding in this update, noted in 7 cross-sectional studies (Appendix 3). Almost all studies investigated xerostomia by questionnaires with self-reported answers, except that by Omezli and Torul (2021), which observed the objective reduction of salivary flow in 18% of patients, indicating the need for more specific analysis to confirm hyposalivation (Appendix 8). Thus, data from 1,017 patients with COVID-19 was pooled, and the metaanalysis showed a prevalence of 43% (95% CI = 36% to 50%, I 2 = 71%; Fig.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Xerostomiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early phase of COVID-19 or during hospitalization, prevalence of xerostomia or dry mouth was 32.0-61.9% for Italian, Israeli, Iranian and Egyptian patients younger than 50 years old [6,7,[19][20][21] and 30.0-46.3% for Chinese and Italian patients older than 50 years old [8,14,15]. When following up after 4 weeks to 8 months from hospital dis-charge or symptom onset, xerostomia persisted in 14.4-40.2% of Turkish, Israeli and Colombian COVID-19 survivors younger than 50 years old [18,20,22] and in 24.6% of Italian COVID-19 survivors older than 50 years old [16]. Xerostomia was also reported by 47.6% of Egyptian patients aged mean 36.2 years who recovered from mild to moderate COVID-19 [17].…”
Section: Agementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Their data analysis indicated that prevalence of dry mouth was 46.3% overall, 46.4% in females and 46.2% in males, showing no statistically significant difference between female and male patients. AbuBakr et al [17] and Omezli and Torul [18] assessed oral symptoms of 573 Egyptian patients who recovered from mild to moderate COVID-19 and 107 Turkish patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 who were discharged from hospital, respectively. Although xerostomia persisted in 40.2-47.6% of these COVID-19 survivors, the statistical analysis showed no significant differences in prevalence between females and males (p = 0.5 in the Egyptian cohort [17] and p = 0.928 in the Turkish cohort [18]).…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation