2016 17th International Scientific Conference on Electric Power Engineering (EPE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/epe.2016.7521768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of thermal comfort of the internal environment in smart home using objective and subjective factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(9) μ stab = 0.0227 (M=10%) , calculation according to Eq. (10) μ opt1 = 0.0062 (M=10%) , calculation according to Eq. (11) μ opt2 = 0.0113 (M=20%) , calculation according to Eq.…”
Section: The Experimental Practical Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(9) μ stab = 0.0227 (M=10%) , calculation according to Eq. (10) μ opt1 = 0.0062 (M=10%) , calculation according to Eq. (11) μ opt2 = 0.0113 (M=20%) , calculation according to Eq.…”
Section: The Experimental Practical Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibilities of developing visualization and monitoring applications using wireless components are described in detail in articles [4][5][6][7]. The actual monitoring of operational and technical variables may be used for optimizing the management of individual operational and technical functions of buildings, such as lighting [8], [9] or HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning), in order to reduce the operating costs of the building, for setting the optimal climate in individual rooms of the building [10] with respect to the requirements of the hygienic standards, or for classification [11], prediction [12] and foreseeing of building behaviour based on the variables [13] measured and processed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental measurements of objective parameters of the internal environment and thermal comfort evaluation were conducted in selected SH rooms R204, R203, and R104 in a wooden building of the passive standard located in the Faculty of Civil Engineering, VSB -TU Ostrava. (Fig.1) [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It contains seven thermal sensation levels: "cold (−3)", "cool (−2)", "slightly cool (−1)", "neutral (0)", "warm (1)", "slightly warm (2)" and "hot(3)", respectively. In [33][34][35], the subjective comfort evaluation methods are given in smart homes. This subjective evaluation level is modified as a subjective comfort level (SCL) to be used for the participant to answer their direct thermal sensation via the online questionnaire with the intention to study the difference in between human's subjective thermal comfort and system's thermal comfort level.…”
Section: Human Thermal Comfortmentioning
confidence: 99%