2014
DOI: 10.1111/hiv.12177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of treatment outcomes for patients on first‐line regimens in US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) clinics in Uganda: predictors of virological and immunological response from RV288 analyses

Abstract: ObjectivesViral load (VL) monitoring is recommended, but seldom performed, in resource-constrained countries. RV288 is a US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) basic programme evaluation to determine the proportion of patients on treatment who are virologically suppressed and to identify predictors of virological suppression and recovery of CD4 cell count. Analyses from Uganda are presented here. MethodsIn this cross-sectional, observational study, patients on first-line antiretroviral therapy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for this increased risk are uncertain, although they might relate to socioeconomic conditions or inconsistent prioritisation of ART adherence over other challenges of daily life. We are uncertain about extrapolation of our findings to Africans living in sub-Saharan Africa, because the lower socioeconomic conditions and greater hardships resulting from taking time from work and getting to a clinic in these settings might mean that rebound rates would be higher than in our study 24, 25, 26. However, the proportion of people reported to be on ART and to have viral loads of less than 1000 copies per mL from studies and routine data from sub-Saharan Africa, 12 most recently from the population-based HIV impact assessments surveys in Malawi (91%), Zimbabwe (87%), and Zambia (89%), suggest that durability of virological suppression could be at least as great in Africa as in the UK 27 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The reasons for this increased risk are uncertain, although they might relate to socioeconomic conditions or inconsistent prioritisation of ART adherence over other challenges of daily life. We are uncertain about extrapolation of our findings to Africans living in sub-Saharan Africa, because the lower socioeconomic conditions and greater hardships resulting from taking time from work and getting to a clinic in these settings might mean that rebound rates would be higher than in our study 24, 25, 26. However, the proportion of people reported to be on ART and to have viral loads of less than 1000 copies per mL from studies and routine data from sub-Saharan Africa, 12 most recently from the population-based HIV impact assessments surveys in Malawi (91%), Zimbabwe (87%), and Zambia (89%), suggest that durability of virological suppression could be at least as great in Africa as in the UK 27 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…A recent analysis of cohorts from the United States and Europe also found an increased risk in treatment failure in patients started on nevirapine as compared to efavirenz-based regimens [31]. In addition, a recent large analysis of a South African cohort showed that patients started on nevirapine were 80% more likely to experience failure as compared to those started on efavirenz, regardless of the nucleoside backbone drug used [32], while in a recent cross-sectional study from Uganda, use of efavirenz was associated with a 50% decrease in risk of treatment failure [33]. We hypothesize that although nevirapine performance in attaining initial virologic suppression and short-term sustainment of virologic suppression seems to be inferior as compared to efavirenz, this effect fades away over time once suppression is achieved and maintained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spijkervet's mucositis index was used for quantifying the oral ulcerations and mucosal lesions. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Patient morbidity could be reduced by early diagnosis of HSV infections and treatment of immunocompromised HIV patients with acyclovir. Thus in all HIV + patients, diagnostic culture should be recommended for herpes simplex virus for all oral ulcers regardless of their location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a positive association of virological suppression with efavirenz use and improvements in CD4 cell percentage and total lymphocyte count. 9 Oral health measures are to be effectively formulated for the HIV-infected individuals with the help of the reports from both developing and developed countries, as HIV infection is a major global health problem. Reports from developed countries on oral lesions in HIV infection are well-documented contrary to the inadequate reports of developing countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%