2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Turkish apricot germplasm using SSR markers: Genetic diversity assessment and search for Plum pox virus resistance alleles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This variability is higher than that reported for P. salicina in other works, i.e., Mnejja et al (2004) and Klabunde et al (2014). It is also higher than that observed in other Prunus species such as almond (Fathi et al, 2008), cherry (Wünsch and Hormaza, 2002; Baris et al, 2017) and apricot (Gürcan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…This variability is higher than that reported for P. salicina in other works, i.e., Mnejja et al (2004) and Klabunde et al (2014). It is also higher than that observed in other Prunus species such as almond (Fathi et al, 2008), cherry (Wünsch and Hormaza, 2002; Baris et al, 2017) and apricot (Gürcan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Compared to dominant markers, SSR markers are co-dominant, highly reproducible, multi-allelic, and widely used in plant sciences (Hajmansoor et al, 2013) for germplasm characterization (Varshney et al, 2005;Peng et al, 2015;Queiroz et al, 2015), identification of genetic diversity (Gurcan et al, 2015;Jo et al, 2015;Mahjbi et al, 2016;Mornkham et al, 2016;Neiva et al, 2016), germplasm fingerprinting (Zhang et al, 2015), and integration of genetic linkage maps (Lai et al, 2013). For C. sinensis, SSR markers have been widely used to identify germplasm genetic diversity (Taniguchi et al, 2014), construction of linkage maps (Tan et al, 2013) and DNA-fingerprinting (Ujihara et al, 2009;Ma et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the minimum repeat length of 12 base-pairs they are tandemly repeated usually 5-20 times in the genome (Goodfellow 1992;Vaughan and Lloyd 2003;Ellegren 2004;Prajapati et al 2017). As a result of their quickness, simplicity, rich polymorphism and stability SSR markers are highly popular in genetic diversity analysis (Turkoglu et al 2013;Gürcan et al 2015;Batnini et al 2016), construction of fingerprints (Cantini et al 2001;Rojas et al 2008;Klabunde et al 2014;Turet-Sayar et al 2012;Ivanovych et al 2017), genetic purity test (Spann et al 2010), molecular map construction and gene mapping (Ogundiwin et al 2009;Olukolu et al 2009;Fan et al 2010;Pacheco et al 2014;Rowland et al 2014;Wang et al 2014;Eduardo et al 2015), utilization of heterosis, especially in the identification of species that are genetically related. Microsatellite markers have also been used in several studies to define conserved regions among related species (Decroocq et al 2003;Martínez-Gómez et al 2003;Maghuly and Laimer 2011;Alisoltani et al 2016) for both plants and animals genome mapping (Weising et al1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%