2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of two HIV antibody confirmatory assays: Geenius™ HIV1/2 Confirmatory Assay and the recomLine HIV-1 & HIV-2 IgG Line Immunoassay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Geenius demonstrated significant advantages over WB in both confirming and excluding HIV infection. Its specificity of 93%, compared to 90% for WB, was equivalent to that of previously reported results (17, 18). The sensitivity of Geenius to confirm HIV-1 infection (100%), evaluated using a panel of serum samples that includes group B (2/3) and non-B (1/3) subtypes, was higher than that of WB (86%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Geenius demonstrated significant advantages over WB in both confirming and excluding HIV infection. Its specificity of 93%, compared to 90% for WB, was equivalent to that of previously reported results (17, 18). The sensitivity of Geenius to confirm HIV-1 infection (100%), evaluated using a panel of serum samples that includes group B (2/3) and non-B (1/3) subtypes, was higher than that of WB (86%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Using WB as a gold standard, Moon et al (21) obtained a sensitivity of 100% using Geenius, suggesting that Geenius did not miss any WB-positive sample. Compared to other confirmatory assays, such as Chiron RIBA, Inno-Lia, or multisport rapid test, Geenius presents excellent performance and has many advantages (11, 17, 19, 22, 23), especially in terms of specificity (99 to 100%) and sensitivity (96 to 100%). To our knowledge, only one study concluded that Geenius was less sensitive and less specific than Inno-Lia, mainly due to its short time of incubation (20 min compared to overnight for Inno-Lia) (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It reduces false gp140 reactivity but had no impact on identifying true HIV‐2 infections. It is well suited for the detection, confirmation and discrimination of HIV‐1‐and HIV‐2‐specific antibodies [9–11,13,34]. The performance of this new confirmatory assay to detect early infections, to reduce the rate of indeterminate status makes Geenius a potent reliable alternative to the Western blot [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bio‐Rad Geenius TM HIV 1/2 is a confirmatory test as powerful as the Western blot or immunoblot test in the confirmation diagnosis of HIV infection. In addition, unlike the Western blot which requires several hours to obtain the result, it gives access to it in less than 30 min thus allowing appropriate therapeutic management and avoids the loss of sight of the individual [9–13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moon ve arkadaşları, Geenius ile %100 duyarlılık elde etmiş ve testin, WB pozitif hiçbir örneği kaçırmadığını saptamışlardır 7 . Chiron RIBA, INNO LIA ® ve multispot hızlı test ile karşılaştıran çalışmalarda, Geenius'un %99-100 özgüllük ve %96-100 duyarlılık ile bu testlerden üstün olduğu saptanmıştır 1,[8][9][10][11] . LIA ile karşılaştırıldığı bir diğer çalışmada, duyarlılık ve özgüllüğün daha düşük olduğu belirtilmiştir 12 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified