2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of UAV and satellite-derived NDVI to map maritime Antarctic vegetation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, NDVI should be used preferably in the studies focused on metabolic/physiological activity of vegetation than in the classification of vegetation component and their coverage area. It is because of the fact that some cryptogamic species exhibit low reflectance in the near-infrared region and are not easily detected by NDVI (Sotille et al 2020). This may complicate NDVI-based determination of species or vegetation functional groups (e.g.…”
Section: Ndvi Msr CI Greenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, NDVI should be used preferably in the studies focused on metabolic/physiological activity of vegetation than in the classification of vegetation component and their coverage area. It is because of the fact that some cryptogamic species exhibit low reflectance in the near-infrared region and are not easily detected by NDVI (Sotille et al 2020). This may complicate NDVI-based determination of species or vegetation functional groups (e.g.…”
Section: Ndvi Msr CI Greenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). For the similarity analysis based on the presence or absence of penguin influence, two areas were defined: A1 (biotic influence) and A2 (no influence), which were delimited from the Operational Land Image (OLI)/Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) image Landsat 8/2014 RGB (bands 5 4 3 infrared composite) (Sotille et al 2020), where the colouring reflected from this composition was used to locate the area of the penguin influence using QGis ® v 3.0.3 software. In addition, the area of penguin influence was also visually identified during the field survey, corroborating the RGB composition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). For the similarity analysis based on the presence or absence of penguin influence, two areas were defined: A1 (biotic influence) and A2 (no influence), which were delimited from the Operational Land Image (OLI)/Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) image Landsat 8/2014 RGB (bands 5 4 3 infrared composite) (Sotille et al 2020), where the colouring reflected from this Barton (1965) and Birkenmajer (1980).…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fretwell et al [20] and Casanovas et al [21,22] studied the distribution of Antarctic vegetation using the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and the matched filtering (MF) approach derived from Landsat images, but the research were unable to identify a pattern between the NDVI values and the vegetation types. Sotille et al [23] assessed the ability of the NDVI from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), Sentinel-2, and Landsat 8 to identify vegetated areas in the ice-free environment of Hope Bay, Antarctic Peninsula, and showed that the NDVI values provided by different sensors were not identical for the same vegetation class. More problematically, because polar vegetation clusters are usually very small [24], a pixel with a decameter spatial resolution usually includes a mix of plants, rocks, soil, and snow backgrounds, leading to poor classification results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%