2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2016.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of undrained failure envelopes of caisson foundations under combined loading

Abstract: In this paper, results of a three-dimensional finite element study addressing the effect of and maximum horizontal bearing capacity factors. The undrained response of caisson 8 foundations under combined V-H and V-M load space is studied and presented using 9 failure envelopes generated with side-swipe method. The kinematic mechanism 10 accompanying failure under uniaxial loading is addressed and presented for different 11 embedment ratios. Predictions of the uniaxial bearing capacities are compared with other… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated results are in good agreement with those of the existing models, indicating that the model and the computational grid can accurately obtain the calculated results, which can be used in the analysis of torsion influence. [17,18,21].…”
Section: Accuracy Verification Of Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculated results are in good agreement with those of the existing models, indicating that the model and the computational grid can accurately obtain the calculated results, which can be used in the analysis of torsion influence. [17,18,21].…”
Section: Accuracy Verification Of Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. Undrained shear strength used in Mehravar's calculation is a fixed value [18] . The results show that the vertical bearing capacity coefficient is a function of L/D, when L/D = 0, the theoretical value of vertical bearing capacity coefficient of the saturated soft clay is 6.18.…”
Section: Vertical Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The installation process of the tripod bucket foundation into the seabed is similar to that of the single suction bucket foundation (monopod). After an initial penetration of the bucket into the seabed caused by self-weight, further penetration is achieved by pumping air and water out of the bucket [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Take Down Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bearing capacity of the single suction bucket foundations has been extensively studied in different soil types [15,[18][19][20], whereas only a few studies have examined the behaviour of tripod suction bucket foundations under lateral loading [21][22][23].…”
Section: Take Down Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the combined foundation capacity under complex vertical (V), horizontal (H) and moment (M) loads are normally represented by a failure envelope (Roscoe, 1956). Extensive studies have been conducted to investigate the failure envelope of the suction caisson foundation in drained sand and undrained clay (Bransby and Randolph, 1998;Bransby and Yun, 2009;Gourvenec and Barnett, 2011;Hung and Kim, 2014;Karapiperis and Gerolymos, 2014;Gerolymos et al, 2015;Vulpe, 2015;Mehravar et al, 2016). Many approximating expressions have been proposed to capture the VHM failure envelopes, as summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%