2012
DOI: 10.7763/ijbbb.2012.v2.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Urinary α-Glutathione-S-Transferase (α-GST) as a Marker of Early Cisplatin Induced Kidney Injury

Abstract: Abstract-Cisplatin is a very effective chemotherapeutic, but the risk of nephrotoxicity frequently hinders the use of its higher dose. This study was designed as a prospective observational cohort study to evaluate the efficacy of urinary renal tubular enzyme α-Glutathione-s-transferase(α-GST) for predicting kidney injury in cisplatin treated cancer patients. Venous blood samples were collected from all the patients, before the administration of cisplatin (baseline), and at 12h, 24h, 48h and 20days after cispl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our unpublished experience with aGST has been that IHC does not correlate well with urine concentrations. In spite of that experience, aGst has been identified in proximal tubules (Bauchet et al 2011) and clinically linked to cisplatin-induced, proximal tubular injury (Saleena et al 2012), and it would be interesting to see if results similar to those obtained with Kim-1 could be derived with aGST. Undoubtedly, there will be no universal method for all biomarkers or all cellular biomarkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our unpublished experience with aGST has been that IHC does not correlate well with urine concentrations. In spite of that experience, aGst has been identified in proximal tubules (Bauchet et al 2011) and clinically linked to cisplatin-induced, proximal tubular injury (Saleena et al 2012), and it would be interesting to see if results similar to those obtained with Kim-1 could be derived with aGST. Undoubtedly, there will be no universal method for all biomarkers or all cellular biomarkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%