2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-017-1850-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Using Remote Sensing Evapotranspiration Data in SWAT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The actual ET estimates can be used either to constrain the hydrological model or as a model evaluation variable for model calibration and/or validation. For example, Parajuli et al [93] used monthly ET estimates from SEBAL model using MODIS datasets to evaluate the performance of the SWAT model in 2 sub-basins (Merigold and Sunflower) within the Big Sunflower River Watershed (BSRW) in Northwestern, Mississippi. They obtained good model performances with the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 during model calibration, and 0.71 to 0.78 during model validation.…”
Section: Implications For Hydrological Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual ET estimates can be used either to constrain the hydrological model or as a model evaluation variable for model calibration and/or validation. For example, Parajuli et al [93] used monthly ET estimates from SEBAL model using MODIS datasets to evaluate the performance of the SWAT model in 2 sub-basins (Merigold and Sunflower) within the Big Sunflower River Watershed (BSRW) in Northwestern, Mississippi. They obtained good model performances with the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 during model calibration, and 0.71 to 0.78 during model validation.…”
Section: Implications For Hydrological Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, PM model-based evapotranspiration and MODIS evapotranspiration data were used as parameter inputs to compare hydrological simulations for the Mississippi River. These studies found that Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency was significantly higher when using MODIS evapotranspiration data (Parajuli et al, 2018). Further research is now required to investigate the specific reasons for this improvement.…”
Section: Potential Impact Of Errors Caused By Pm Methods In Arid Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing data provide an alternative solution for this problem. Over the past decades, remote sensing data have been widely used for precipitation estimation, land use classification, evapotranspiration inversion, vegetation indices and soil moisture prediction [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. For ungauged basins, remote sensing data are particularly useful in drought forecasting, runoff estimation and rainfall frequency analysis [18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%