1991
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(91)91214-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of vagal afferent modulation of the digastric reflex in cats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The analgesic effect of the vagal afferent stimulation has been reported in numerous behavioral pain tests in laboratory animals. For instance, the VNS-induced inhibition of the nociceptive digastric reflex induced by intense tooth-pulp stimulation (Maixner et al, 1991;Bossut et al, 1992), reduction of the cumulative duration of rubbing and scratching the injection site in the orofacial formalin test (Bohotin et al, 2003b), and latency increase of the tail-flick or the hind paw withdrawal response to noxious heat (Ren et al, 1989;Aicher et al, 1991;Thurston and Randich, 1991;Bohotin et al, 2003a) were reported. In epileptic patients treated with VNS, an increase in mechanical pain threshold was noted (Kirchner et al, 2000(Kirchner et al, , 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analgesic effect of the vagal afferent stimulation has been reported in numerous behavioral pain tests in laboratory animals. For instance, the VNS-induced inhibition of the nociceptive digastric reflex induced by intense tooth-pulp stimulation (Maixner et al, 1991;Bossut et al, 1992), reduction of the cumulative duration of rubbing and scratching the injection site in the orofacial formalin test (Bohotin et al, 2003b), and latency increase of the tail-flick or the hind paw withdrawal response to noxious heat (Ren et al, 1989;Aicher et al, 1991;Thurston and Randich, 1991;Bohotin et al, 2003a) were reported. In epileptic patients treated with VNS, an increase in mechanical pain threshold was noted (Kirchner et al, 2000(Kirchner et al, , 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Chase et al 24,25 reported that the TP-evoked JOR was inhibited by electrical stimulation of vagal afferents in the cat. This inhibitory effect is observed at C-T intervals of between 50 and 200 ms. 26 The magnitude of inhibition depends upon the intensity, frequency, or number of pulses in the same species. 19 It is therefore possible that vagal afferent activity may modify the JOR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tartar was removed, and enamel was scraped off the tooth at a point approximately 4 mm from the tip of the tooth. 32,33 Repetitive stimulation was used, because a single stimulus of short duration may fail to elicit an aversive response in a conscious animal, whereas consecutive stimuli will elicit such a response. 30 The cathode electrode was inserted just beneath the buccal mucosa adjacent to the root apex of the same maxillary canine tooth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%