2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of various QuEChERS based methods for the analysis of herbicides and other commonly used pesticides in polished rice by LC–MS/MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
63
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
63
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…But remarkably low recovery (only 8.4 % with RSD<5.4 %) was observed for imazethapyr (Fig. 4), which probably was due to the -COOH group in imazethapyr that reacts with the -NH 2 group of PSA (Pareja et al 2011). With florisil clean-up also, imazethapyr gave remarkably low recovery of 21.1±12.54 %.…”
Section: −1mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But remarkably low recovery (only 8.4 % with RSD<5.4 %) was observed for imazethapyr (Fig. 4), which probably was due to the -COOH group in imazethapyr that reacts with the -NH 2 group of PSA (Pareja et al 2011). With florisil clean-up also, imazethapyr gave remarkably low recovery of 21.1±12.54 %.…”
Section: −1mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For determining pesticide residues in food matrices of low water content or high fat content, the sample size for extraction is reduced and water added to make sample pores more accessible to the extraction solvent (Walorczyk, 2008;Pareja et al 2011). Different trial approaches were examined in a pilot study and the efficiency of the extraction process was comparatively assessed considering the relative standard deviation (RSD) values.…”
Section: Optimization Of Extraction Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anastassiades et al (2003) described the application of QuEChERS for extraction of carbaryl in other matrices, using unbuffered original QuEChERS approach (QuEChERS A), dispersive AOAC 2007.01 method (QuEChERS B, (MethodAOAC 2007)), and European Norm EN15662 (QuEChERS C, (EN15662 2008)). Pareja et al (2011) examined three types of QuEChERS for extraction of carbaryl in rice achieving recoveries between 102.6% and 106.5%, 90.1% and 108.2%, and 97.3% and 114.7% using the unbuffered original QuEChERS approach, acetate buffer, and citrate buffer QuEChERS, respectively. To the unbuffered original QuEChERS approach (Anastassiades et al 2003), sodium acetate was added and this modified QuEChERS was used for extraction of carbaryl in samples, such as meat, beverages (milk, coffee, red wine, and grape and orange juices), fruits and vegetables, bread, rice, cake, cheese, chocolate, corn oil, peanut, peanut butter, potato chips, walnut, oyster sauce, chestnut, egg, oyster, persimmon, pumpkin, and soy bean.…”
Section: Extraction Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the Quick, Effective, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe (QuEChERS) technique was developed, primarily for extraction of multiclass pesticide residues in non-fatty matrices such as sugarcane honey [19], honey [20,21], fruits and vegetables [22,23] and its application has subsequently been extended to the extraction of multiclass pesticide residues from high fat matrices such as raw cereals and their processed products [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. The QuEChERS method eliminates several time consuming and complicated sample pretreatment steps commonly employed in traditional methods [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, although QuEChERS procedure nowadays, is a method of choice for analysis of multiclass pesticides residues in various solid and semi-solid samples, it does not involve preconcentration (enrichment) of the target analytes [31,32]. Quantitative determination of the final extract of the sample has commonly been performed utilizing highly sensitive analytical techniques such as gas (GC) and/or liquid chromatography (LC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) or tandem mass spectrometric (MS/MS) detectors [3,23,25,30,33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%