2003
DOI: 10.1089/107632703764664783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Various Seeding Techniques for Culturing Osteogenic Cells on Titanium Fiber Mesh

Abstract: The objective of the present study was to learn more about the effect of seeding and loading techniques on the osteogenic differentiation in vitro of rat bone marrow cells into titanium fiber mesh. This material was used as received or subjected to glow discharge treatment (RFGD). The seeding methods that were used included a so-called droplet, cell suspension (high and low cell density), and rotating plate method. Osteogenic cells were cultured for 4, 8, and 16 days into titanium fiber mesh. DNA, osteocalcin,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
65
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…30 However, after achieving in vitro terminal osteodifferentiation, including a large production of the calcium matrix in the short timeframe of a few weeks, osteoblast viability and synthetic activity are usually exhausted. On the other hand, naturally occurring osteogenesis results from the coexistence of MSC-derived progenies at distinct differentiative stages, which form a complex and intercommunicating microenvironment with their ECM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…30 However, after achieving in vitro terminal osteodifferentiation, including a large production of the calcium matrix in the short timeframe of a few weeks, osteoblast viability and synthetic activity are usually exhausted. On the other hand, naturally occurring osteogenesis results from the coexistence of MSC-derived progenies at distinct differentiative stages, which form a complex and intercommunicating microenvironment with their ECM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of finding appropriate methods for MSC seeding has also been pointed out by several authors looking for optimization of their tissue constructs; 14,30,32 however, the seeded cell number should always be considered a decisive parameter to be taken into account, as it affects the cell loss at seeding (i.e., the real cell density achieved per scaffold area) together with the scaffold-specific architecture and material and surface properties. 33 Cell-cell signals have indeed proved to be extremely important in cell proliferation, migration, and ECM molecule deposition and either too high or too low densities may be equally detrimental to achieve the desired neotissue formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4,6,[10][11][12] Static seeding also presents the disadvantage of leading to a nonuniform cell distribution. 3,4,10 Dynamic cell seeding with bioreactors has proven to provide a higher efficiency and more even distribution of cells, 13 more particularly within 3D scaffolds, where perfusion systems were reported to lead to greater efficiency and better cell distribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van den Dolder and colleagues reported on the utility of the combination of TFM and BMSCs for bone tissue engineering (Van Dolder et al 2002, 2003a. In their previous studies, various techniques were used to show that cell seeding into TFM could be achieved by rotating a 10 mL tube containing a cell suspension on a rotation plate at 2 rpm (Van Dolder et al 2002, 2003b), a droplet technique in which the cell suspension was placed as a droplet on top of the TFM (Van Den Dolder et al 2003c), a cell suspension technique with the TFM in a 24 well plate (containing cell suspension) that was manually shaken every half hour (Van Den Dolder et al 2003c) and a flow perfusion culture system (Van Den Dolder et al 2003a). However, the rotation plate, droplet and cell suspension techniques showed limited cell penetration into TFM (Van Den Dolder et al 2003a, c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was proposed that this variance was due to BMSCs being a heterogeneous cell population, and a homogeneous cell population is necessary to produce reliable and standardized tissueengineered bone constructs (Van Dolder et al 2002, 2003c. DFAT cells comprise a highly homogeneous cell population because DFAT cells originate from a fraction of highly homogeneous mature adipocytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%