2013
DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2013.187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Various Static In Vitro–In Vivo Extrapolation Models for Risk Assessment of the CYP3A Inhibition Potential of an Investigational Drug

Abstract: Nine static models (seven basic and two mechanistic) and their respective cutoff values used for predicting cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) inhibition, as recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, were evaluated using data from 119 clinical studies with orally administered midazolam as a substrate. Positive predictive error (PPE) and negative predictive error (NPE) rates were used to assess model performance, based on a cutoff of 1.25-fold change in midazolam area under t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
102
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers are also encouraged to read comprehensive recent publications on victim DDIs resulting from modulation of transporters (Lai and Hsiao, 2014;Nakanishi and Tamai, 2015). Other topics not within the scope of this manuscript but comprehensively covered in recent publications include evaluation of NMEs as perpetrators of DDIs (Zhao et al, 2014;Varma et al, 2015) and assessment of performance of static and dynamic models commonly used for successful prediction of clinical DDIs (Vieira et al, 2014). This manuscript will summarize the commonly adopted industry practices, which include in vitro methods, in combination with in vivo preclinical and clinical studies, along with modeling and simulation, to best estimate the potential of a NME to be a victim of P450 and non-P450-mediated metabolic DDIs in the clinic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Researchers are also encouraged to read comprehensive recent publications on victim DDIs resulting from modulation of transporters (Lai and Hsiao, 2014;Nakanishi and Tamai, 2015). Other topics not within the scope of this manuscript but comprehensively covered in recent publications include evaluation of NMEs as perpetrators of DDIs (Zhao et al, 2014;Varma et al, 2015) and assessment of performance of static and dynamic models commonly used for successful prediction of clinical DDIs (Vieira et al, 2014). This manuscript will summarize the commonly adopted industry practices, which include in vitro methods, in combination with in vivo preclinical and clinical studies, along with modeling and simulation, to best estimate the potential of a NME to be a victim of P450 and non-P450-mediated metabolic DDIs in the clinic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is commonly done via evaluation of: 1) in vitro f m in human-derived matrices to understand whether one or multiple P450 or non-P450 enzymes are involved in a NME's metabolism and 2) in vivo f CL information in preclinical species and whether in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) holds in preclinical species to gain qualitative understanding of whether metabolism or biliary or renal excretion is predominant. The combined information obtained is used as an early guide to evaluate victim DDI risk in the clinic using various predictive models (Vieira et al, 2014). Once the f CL,metabolism is available from human 14 C-ADME study and f m , enzyme is quantitatively available from a clinical DDI study (or PK study in genotyped population), the victim DDI predictions are further refined to predict additional and/or potentially complex DDIs before the NME being administered in larger clinical trials (Lu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the clinical effects were clearly overestimated using [I]/K i values (2.41, 3.68 and 3.95 respectively). This indicates that factors such as protein binding which affects 'enzyme-available' inhibitor concentrations, as well as inhibition across multiple organs, could potentially complicate the predictive power of the in vitro models, and models that take the relevant confounding factors into account should provide better prediction for in vitro-in vivo scaling [19].…”
Section: In Vitro Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13] The ratio of intrinsic clear- ance value of the substrate for specific CYP reaction in the presence or absence of the gastrointestinal drug (R value) was calculated as follows:…”
Section: Prediction Of Drug Interactions In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%