2018
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201815003007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Microphysics single moment class-3 and class-6 in Precipitation Forecast

Abstract: Abstract. In this study, the performance of two different Microphysics Scheme options in Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model were evaluated for the estimating the precipitation forecast. The schemes WRF single moment class-3 (WSM-3) and single moment class-6 (WSM-6) were employed to produce the minimum, medium and maximum precipitation for the selected events over the Kuantan River Basin (KRB). The obtained simulated results were compared with the observed data from eight different rainfall gauging st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For all simulations, the same parameterization of physics and model dynamics was used. We applied a single-moment microphysics scheme with six hydrometeor classes (WSM6) (Zaidi, Gisen 2018), which is the most suitable for high-resolution simulations (see, e.g., Hong et al 2010;Parodi et al 2019). For domain 1, parameterization of convective processes was performed using the Grell-Freitas method (Grell, Freitas 2014), while for domains 2 and 3, explicit wet process physics was used.…”
Section: Wrf Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all simulations, the same parameterization of physics and model dynamics was used. We applied a single-moment microphysics scheme with six hydrometeor classes (WSM6) (Zaidi, Gisen 2018), which is the most suitable for high-resolution simulations (see, e.g., Hong et al 2010;Parodi et al 2019). For domain 1, parameterization of convective processes was performed using the Grell-Freitas method (Grell, Freitas 2014), while for domains 2 and 3, explicit wet process physics was used.…”
Section: Wrf Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this study adopted only MP and CU schemes. Currently, there are 13 microphysics and 14 cumulus schemes available for model simulation [44]. It is to be noted that not every scheme is suitable for all regions and climatic conditions.…”
Section: Selection Of Schemes For Model Sensitivity Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a single-moment microphysics scheme with six hydrometeor classes (WSM6) (Zaidi and Gisen 2018), Grell-Freitas convective parameterisation (Grell and Freitas 2014) for the 12.5-km domain, and explicit wet process physics for the 2.5-km domain. The model used RRTMG radiative scheme (Iacono et al 2008), the Mellor Yamada Nakanishi Niino (MYNN) turbulence scheme (Nakanishi and Niino 2009) with 2.5-order closure for boundary layer processes, and the MYNN level 3 scheme for parametrisation of the near-surface layer (Nakanishi and Niino 2006).…”
Section: Weather Research and Forecasting Model Datamentioning
confidence: 99%