Evaluation of YouTube Video Content About Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Öztermeli, Ahmet; Karahan, Nazım

doi:10.7759/cureus.9557

Cited by 16 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Based on GQS scoring, the quality of the viewed YouTube was found as moderate. The mean GQS score was reported as 4.00 by Onder et al [ 28 ], 3.08 by Ustdal et al [ 29 ], and 2.46 by Oztermeli et al [ 30 ] with higher GQS scores were given to the videos uploaded by health professionals. Again our higher GQS scores might be attributed to the fact that the majority of the videos were uploaded by health professionals.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of YouTube videos as a source of information for myocarditis during the COVID-19 pandemic

Memioğlu

Özyaşar

2022

Clin Res Cardiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective In this study, we aimed to examine the content, reliability, and quality of YouTube video contents concerning myocarditis and its association with the COVID-19 for the first time in the literature. Methods The most viewed 50 videos were included in the analysis. The time since the videos were uploaded, video length, type of image (real/animation), video content, qualify of the uploaders, the number of daily and total views, likes, dislikes, comments and VPI were recorded. The reliability of the videos was determined using the modified DISCERN criteria for consumer health information, while the quality was determined with the GQS. Results The mean length of the videos was found as 6.25 ± 5.20 min. Contents of the videos included general information, COVID-19, vaccination, diagnosis, patient experience and treatment. The most common contents were regarding COVID-19 and vaccination by 44%. The uploaders of the videos were classified as physicians, hospital channels, health channels, patients and others. Fourteen (28%) videos were directly uploaded by physicians. The most viewed, liked and disliked videos were uploaded by health channels. The mean VPI score was calculated as 92.89 ± 12.29. The mean DISCERN score of all videos was 3.88 ± 0.77 and the mean GQS score was 3.63 ± 0.85. Reliability and quality of the videos were moderate. Conclusion YouTube videos on myocarditis have mostly focused on the associations between myocarditis and COVID-19 disease and vaccination. Health-related contents on YouTube should be subjected to peer review and quality assessment. Graphical abstract

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of YouTube videos as a source of information for myocarditis during the COVID-19 pandemic

Memioğlu

Özyaşar

2022

Clin Res Cardiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Researchers accredited this to the nature of the uploaders of the videos. It has been reported that the videos uploaded by patients and their relatives are bad and misleading [ 27 ]. We found that only three of the 50 videos we examined were uploaded by patients and all of these contained misleading content.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of YouTube Video Content Related to the Management of Hypoglycemia

Çetin¹

2021

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Hypoglycemia is a syndrome characterized by decreased blood glucose levels and can result in morbidity and mortality. Often, patients seek information about hypoglycemia from the Internet and especially YouTube. The objective of this study was to investigate the quality and reliability of the 50 most viewed videos related to hypoglycemia on YouTube. Methods The links of 50 videos that met the criteria were copied to spreadsheet software. Attributes of the uploaders, the content of the videos, their screening time, the date they were uploaded, the number of days since the upload date, the number of daily views, comments, likes, dislike, and video power indexes were recorded. The videos were assessed by two independent emergency specialists using DISCERN and global quality scales (GQS). Results Of the selection, 27 (54%) videos were uploaded by health channels, 11 (22%) by physicians, nine (18%) by hospital channels, and three (6%) by patients. Furthermore, 30 (60%) of these 50 videos were real-content videos and 20 (40%) were animations. The average DISCERN score given by the researchers to 50 videos was 3.72 ± 0.90 (min-max: 1-5) and the average GQS score was 3.65 ± 0.88. Mean video power index (VPI) value was determined as 92.64 ± 11. According to Pearson’s analysis, there was a good agreement between the two observers. Conclusion Videos uploaded by physicians were useful. However, health videos should only be uploaded by physicians. Uploading videos with content that the patients and their relatives can clearly understand is of paramount importance.

show abstract

“…16 It has been subsequently validated through many studies throughout orthopedic literature. 8,10,12,15,20 Videos were categorized by the source responsible for providing the video: physician, academic, commercial, nonphysician/trainer, or media. Physician videos were those originating from a private practice or produced by an individual surgeon not affiliated with an academic center, while academic videos were those produced by academic centers or surgeons.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Health-related videos published on the YouTube platform do not require editorial review or evaluation of credibility prior to being uploaded, and patients accessing this information are given no indication of material quality. Investigations into the quality and accuracy of YouTube videos have been undertaken for a wide range of orthopedic conditions and procedures, including hip and knee arthroplasty, 6 common hip and knee injuries, 7 -11 shoulder pathology, 12,13 pediatric conditions, 14,15 and spine pathology. 16 -19 In the realm of foot and ankle care, the quality of YouTube as a source of information on hallux valgus surgery and diabetic foot care has been previously studied.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

YouTube as a Source of Patient Information for Ankle Arthroplasty: Quantitative Analysis of Video Reliability, Quality, and Content

Hartnett

Yang

Lama

et al. 2022

Foot & Ankle Specialist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. There are limited data on the quality and content of videos discussing total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) on the YouTube video platform. Methods. The first 60 unique YouTube videos resulting from the keyword query “ankle arthroplasty” and “ankle replacement” were analyzed for comprehensiveness and quality. Content was assessed using the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, DISCERN, Global Quality Scale (GQS), and an arthroplasty-specific score. Results. Videos demonstrated low mean DISCERN (49.2/80), GQS (3.2/5), and arthroplasty-specific scores (4.3/12) with substantial variability between videos. Most of the content was produced by nonacademic physicians (46.7%) and academic sources (21.7%). Academic videos saw significantly higher mean JAMA scores ( P = .013) but were otherwise comparable to non-academic physicians. Commercial content demonstrated significantly low-quality scores compared to academic ( P = .012) and physician ( P = .008) sources despite the highest mean viewership. Conclusions. Information on TAA on the YouTube platform is highly variable based on video source, with generally poor quality and content. Level of Evidence: Level V, systemic review of non-peer reviewed resources

show abstract

Evaluation of YouTube Video Content About Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Cited by 16 publications

References 25 publications

Analysis of YouTube videos as a source of information for myocarditis during the COVID-19 pandemic

Analysis of YouTube videos as a source of information for myocarditis during the COVID-19 pandemic

Evaluation of YouTube Video Content Related to the Management of Hypoglycemia

YouTube as a Source of Patient Information for Ankle Arthroplasty: Quantitative Analysis of Video Reliability, Quality, and Content

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About