2003
DOI: 10.1504/ijesd.2003.002361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation studies of Joint Forest Management in India: social and institutional implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The degree of aboriginal influence varies worldwide. Problems range from unrecognised aboriginal resource rights and title in New Zealand (Coombes, 2007); to lack of community participation, ineffective leadership and tenural security in India (Murali et al, 2003). Research efforts have attempted to understand the convergence and divergence of traditional knowledge versus science such that aboriginal perspectives and values can be better integrated (Hawley et al, 2004;Ettenger et al, 2002;Moller et al, 2004;Lévesque and Montpetit, 1997;DavidsonHunt and Berkes, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The degree of aboriginal influence varies worldwide. Problems range from unrecognised aboriginal resource rights and title in New Zealand (Coombes, 2007); to lack of community participation, ineffective leadership and tenural security in India (Murali et al, 2003). Research efforts have attempted to understand the convergence and divergence of traditional knowledge versus science such that aboriginal perspectives and values can be better integrated (Hawley et al, 2004;Ettenger et al, 2002;Moller et al, 2004;Lévesque and Montpetit, 1997;DavidsonHunt and Berkes, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research efforts have attempted to understand the convergence and divergence of traditional knowledge versus science such that aboriginal perspectives and values can be better integrated (Hawley et al, 2004;Ettenger et al, 2002;Moller et al, 2004;Lévesque and Montpetit, 1997;DavidsonHunt and Berkes, 2003). Some studies have also reviewed partnerships between industry/government and aboriginal/ forest dependent communities in forestry to assess their involvement in management decisions (Bhattacharya and Basnyat, 2003;Murali et al, 2003;Hickey and Nelson, 2005;Ross and Smith, 2002;Natcher et al, 2005;Sherry et al, 2005). However, the above research efforts have only served to justify the importance of aboriginal perspectives and the need for ongoing efforts towards effective community management (Sheppard and Meitner, 2005;Lewis and Sheppard, 2006;Parrotta and Agnoletti, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In India, in 2003, a decade after initiating the Joint Forest Management (JFM), evaluations of this program indicated that huge progress had been made in terms of the number of Forest Protection Committees (FPCs) formed (nearly 63 000) [9], which covered an area of about 15 Mha. Nevertheless, the number of FPCs functioning is very low.…”
Section: Proposal Based On the Indian And African Experience Of Villamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These encouraged the involvement of NGOs as intermediaries and facilitators of local group formation. There are now some 65,000 forest protection committees and forest users' groups in these two countries, managing several million ha of forest, mostly with their own rules and sanctions (Shrestha, 1997;SPWD, 1998;Mukherjee, 2001;Murali et al, 2002Murali et al, , 2003. Benefits include increased fuelwood and fodder productivity, improved biodiversity in regenerated forests and income growth amongst the poorest of households.…”
Section: Joint and Participatory Forest Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%