2019
DOI: 10.1002/ev.20378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation With a Focus on Justice

Abstract: This chapter focuses on evaluations conducted through a social justice lens. Ernest House, who is located on the valuing branch of the Evaluation Theory Tree, focuses on justice as equality. He examines the Women Affirming Motherhood program description and considers what approaches might lead to an egalitarian evaluation that helps the program in its efforts to expand. In particular, House proposes a collaborative evaluation team, an investigation of causal factors including racial framing, and presentation o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…“Ordinarily, I would consider an evaluation complete when evaluators determine the merit or worth of what is evaluated. However, racism, sexism, and some economic inequalities are so deeply entrenched and resurgent that discovering and revealing the social mechanisms generating them might be worth the effort, especially since mechanisms like racial framing can bias evaluations as well” (House, 2019, p. 64). Infusing a racialized lens into evaluation practice can help identify how race is incorporated into defining and solving problems of practice, and how it shapes groups’ access to opportunity (Thomas et al., 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“Ordinarily, I would consider an evaluation complete when evaluators determine the merit or worth of what is evaluated. However, racism, sexism, and some economic inequalities are so deeply entrenched and resurgent that discovering and revealing the social mechanisms generating them might be worth the effort, especially since mechanisms like racial framing can bias evaluations as well” (House, 2019, p. 64). Infusing a racialized lens into evaluation practice can help identify how race is incorporated into defining and solving problems of practice, and how it shapes groups’ access to opportunity (Thomas et al., 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conducting a critical analysis of the narrative can help the case writer identify language or representations of case actors that perpetuate stereotypes, microaggressions, and existing power structures, within the narrative (Kallemeyn, et al., 2021). If identified, these elements can be changed, removed, or addressed in the instructor resources to support transformative pedagogy and learning (Montrosse‐Moorhead, et al., 2021) and demonstrate how sexism, racism, and classism can influence or bias evaluations (House, 2019).…”
Section: Designing Developing and Writing A Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e advisory group will aim for representation of a variety of stakeholders-for example, students, staff , caregivers, Indigenous elders and knowledge keepers, and representatives from ethnocultural communities. When stakeholders are diverse, promoting the theme of "learning together" throughout the change process can assist in levelling the unequal social hierarchies that exist (House, 2019). Voegeli, Schmitt-Boshnick, and Krupa (2021) found identifying the purpose is essential for the success of an advisory group's contribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%