Évaluer l’administration de la justice dans les pays européens. Une co-construction entre Union européenne et Conseil de l’Europe

Cappellina, Bartolomeo

doi:10.3917/rfap.161.0059

Cited by 6 publications

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

The shrinkage of justice and hospital facilities in small French cities (2000–2016)

Baudet-Michel

Chouraqui

Conti

et al. 2021

Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In many countries, the objective of reducing public spending combined with the introduction of New Public Management reforms have led to changes in the territorial organization of public services and to a withdrawal of public facilities in many places. Our hypothesis is that in France, this territorial process has not occurred in the same way in all cities. We assume that while medium-sized cities are seeing a reduction in some public service facilities, their disappearance usually occurs in small cities. Larger metropolitan areas have not been affected by such territorial retrenchment of public services facilities. These differences could lead to increased territorial inequalities at the level of urban systems and to a marginalization of some small cities. This paper examines these processes through a quantitative analysis of changes in the location of justice courts and hospital beds from 2000 to 2016, within French Functional Urban Areas.It shows that the decrease in the number of justice and hospital facilities was significant and has affected small cities.

show abstract

The shrinkage of justice and hospital facilities in small French cities (2000–2016)

Baudet-Michel

Chouraqui

Conti

et al. 2021

Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The challenge of comparing EU Member States judicial data

Onţanu

Velicogna

2021

Oñati Socio-Legal Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The number of cases is measured through a broad range of quantitative variables used in various studies and policy papers as key indicators of the volume of activity of national courts. Additionally, these variables, together with other data (e.g. time needed to resolve a case, number of judges, etc.) are part of a broader discourse on the efficiency of justice systems. However, such discourse can be problematic when data is not actually comparable. To raise the attention on this very relevant but poorly explored topic, this paper analyses the comparability of the caseload data by focusing on apparently simple categories like civil and commercial litigious or non-litigious cases and administrative cases. The EU Justice Scoreboard and CEPEJ data and national case definitions in France, Italy, and Romania are used to assess the most relevant justice EU datasets. The findings point towards significant differences between analysed systems that suggest extreme caution should be exercised when using such data for scholarly, legislative or policy discourses. El número de casos se mide mediante una amplia gama de variables cuantitativas que se utilizan en varios estudios y documentos de política como indicadores claves del volumen de actividad en tribunales nacionales. Además, esas variables, junto con otros datos (por ej., tiempo que se ha necesitado para resolver un caso, número de jueces, etc.), son parte de un discurso más amplio sobre la eficacia de los sistemas judiciales. Sin embargo, ese discurso puede ser problemático cuando los datos no son comparables. Para llamar la atención sobre este tema, tan importante como poco explorado, este artículo analiza la comparabilidad de los datos sobre la carga de trabajo. Para ello, se centra en categorías aparentemente sencillas, como casos litigiosos o no litigiosos civiles y comerciales, y casos administrativos. Se utilizan los datos del indicador de la justicia de la UE y de la CEPEJ y definiciones de casos nacionales de Francia, Italia y Rumanía para evaluar los conjuntos de datos más importantes de la UE. Los hallazgos apuntan a diferencias significativas entre los sistemas analizados, las cuales hacen pensar que se deben utilizar esos datos con la máxima cautela ya sea en discursos académicos, legislativos o políticos.

show abstract

Bibliographie

2018

Réformes De La Justice en Europe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Évaluer l’administration de la justice dans les pays européens. Une co-construction entre Union européenne et Conseil de l’Europe

Cited by 6 publications

References 13 publications

The shrinkage of justice and hospital facilities in small French cities (2000–2016)

The shrinkage of justice and hospital facilities in small French cities (2000–2016)

The challenge of comparing EU Member States judicial data

Bibliographie

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About