2021
DOI: 10.1002/asjc.2603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event‐triggered control for bipartite consensus and formation of multiple wheeled mobile robots with non‐holonomic constraint

Abstract: This paper studies the event-triggered control scheme to tackle the position centroid bipartite consensus/formation problems of multiple wheeled mobile robots with non-holonomic constraint. Based on a reversible input conversion, the dynamics of the reference positions of robots are described as two teams of first-order integrators. The event-triggered control input and the event-triggering condition are constructed, ensuring that the position of each robot converges to the initial bipartite centroid location … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“… The asynchronous controller taking into the attacker's information account is developed under the framework of the hidden Markov model, which means that it is more general and flexible than the synchronous [1, 6–8] or mode‐independent ones [4,5]. Compared with the time‐triggered/event‐triggered schemes [23–28], the hybrid‐triggered scheme used in this paper not only can maintain good performance but also save limited communication resources. Compared with the HMM used in [42–44], in which the conditional probability matrix (CPM) must be accurately known, a more generalized HMM is introduced in this paper, in which some elements need not be completely known. Therefore, such a model is more general. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“… The asynchronous controller taking into the attacker's information account is developed under the framework of the hidden Markov model, which means that it is more general and flexible than the synchronous [1, 6–8] or mode‐independent ones [4,5]. Compared with the time‐triggered/event‐triggered schemes [23–28], the hybrid‐triggered scheme used in this paper not only can maintain good performance but also save limited communication resources. Compared with the HMM used in [42–44], in which the conditional probability matrix (CPM) must be accurately known, a more generalized HMM is introduced in this paper, in which some elements need not be completely known. Therefore, such a model is more general. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the time‐triggered/event‐triggered schemes [23–28], the hybrid‐triggered scheme used in this paper not only can maintain good performance but also save limited communication resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…can be used to solve the difficulty of modeling nonlinear systems. Due to its numerous benefits over asymptotical consensus, such as quicker convergence speed and higher disturbance rejection ability, we got considerable attention in the study of MASs [13][14][15][16][17][18]. Previous works are superior to those published in the literature based on the criteria obtained.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%