Event‐triggered control for finite‐time lag synchronisation of time‐delayed complex networks

Event‐triggered communication for passivity and synchronisation of multi‐weighted coupled neural networks with and without parameter uncertainties

“…It can conquer the shortcomings of the continuous control method and reduce the unnecessary transmission of the communication media during the process of information exchanging. In recent years, some interesting results on eventtriggered passivity and synchronization of complex networks have been gained [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. The authors in [16] designed two kinds of distributed event-triggering laws and some criteria that insure the event-based exponential synchronization were established.…”

Event-Triggered Control for Nonlinear Time-Delay Systems

“…Event-triggered stabilization of stochastic nonlinear systems with discrete delays and external disturbances was initially investigated in [15] in which the global Lipschitz condition is required on the nonlinear dynamics. There are few other interesting event-triggering schemes introduced for some particular network systems with sufficient conditions provided for the exclusion of Zeno behavior (see, e.g., [16]- [18] for more details). Recently, event-triggering algorithms under sample-and-hold implementations were constructed in [19], [20] for stabilization of general nonlinear systems with time delay.…”

Decentralised finite‐time consensus for second‐order multi‐agent system under event‐triggered strategy

“…One major concern is the communication constrains, e.g. via limited medium [30], with finite‐time lag synchronisation [33], with packet losses and delays in communication [34] and so on. Other limitations under consideration are non‐linear plant dynamics [31], switching topology [27, 31], combination control with impulsive control strategy [32] and with external disturbances [28] and so on.…”