Please cite this article as: Hunt, L.A., McGee, P., Gutteridge, R., Hughes, M., Manipulating mentors' assessment decisions: Do underperforming student nurses use coercive strategies to influence mentors' practical assessment decisions?, Nurse Education in Practice (2016Practice ( ), doi: 10.1016Practice ( /j.nepr.2016 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
MANIPULATING MENTORS' ASSESSMENT DECISIONS: DO UNDERPERFORMING STUDENT NURSES USE COERCIVE STRATEGIES TO INFLUENCE MENTORS' PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT DECISIONS? AbstractThere is growing evidence of a culture of expectation among nursing students in Universities which leads to narcissistic behaviour. Evidence is growing that some student nurses are disrespectful and rude towards their university lecturers. There has been little investigation into whether they exhibit similar behaviour towards their mentors during practical placements, particularly when they, the students, are not meeting the required standards for practice. This paper focuses on adding to the evidence around a unique finding -that student nurses can use coercive and manipulative behaviour to elicit a successful outcome to their practice learning assessment (as noted in Hunt et al. (2016, p 82)).
Highlights• Student nurses are expected to behave in a professional way towards others.• Many student nurses exhibited coercive and manipulative behaviours when mentors told them that their practice did not meet the criteria required to pass their assessment.• Four types of coercive student behaviour were identified and classified as: ingratiators, diverters, disparagers and aggressors, each of which engendered varying degrees of fear and guilt in mentors.• A four pronged approach is recommended to assist mentors in managing coercive students: manage students' expectations, identify of the locus of the fail, recognition of coercive strategies, and support from official agencies.