Studies in Pure Mathematics 1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-5438-2_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Every group admits a bad topology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…topology which do not for any n < ω admit an SSGP(n) topology. Indeed from Corollary 3.14 and Theorem 3.9 respectively we see that the groups G = Z and G = Z(p ∞ ) admit no SSGP(n) topology; while Ajtai, Havas, and Komlós [1], and later Zelenyuk and Protasov [41], have shown the existence of m.a.p. topologies for Z and for Z(p ∞ ).…”
Section: Definition 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…topology which do not for any n < ω admit an SSGP(n) topology. Indeed from Corollary 3.14 and Theorem 3.9 respectively we see that the groups G = Z and G = Z(p ∞ ) admit no SSGP(n) topology; while Ajtai, Havas, and Komlós [1], and later Zelenyuk and Protasov [41], have shown the existence of m.a.p. topologies for Z and for Z(p ∞ ).…”
Section: Definition 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…topology. (d) Ajtai, Havas and Komlós [1] proved that each group G of the form Z, Z(p ∞ ), or n Z(p n ) (with all p n ∈ P either identical or distinct) admits a m.a.p. group topology.…”
Section: (2332) (C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, define (algebraically) G n := H ⊕ G n−1 ; we give G n a metric topology T n which is different from the product topology, using a technique taken from M. Ajtai, I. Havas, and J. Komlós [1]. We create a metric group topology on G n starting with a function ν : S → R + , where S is a specified generating set for G n with 0 / ∈ S. S will typically be highly redundant as a generating set.…”
Section: Theorem 42 Prodanov's Group (G T ) Satisfies (G T ) ∈ Ssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many examples of MAP monothetic Polish groups (see e.g. [2]). The following problem was posed in [12].…”
Section: Theorem (A-g)mentioning
confidence: 99%