1966
DOI: 10.1007/bf02052848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Every non-normable Frechet space is homeomorphic with all of its closed convex bodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1967
1967
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was generalized to every Banach space with the help of Bessaga's non-complete norm technique (see the book by Bessaga and Peĺczyński [7]). To get a better insight in the history of the topological classification of convex bodies the reader should also look at the papers by Stocker [25], Corson and Klee [10], and Bessaga and Klee [5,6]. In [15], T. Dobrowolski gave a C p smooth version of that result which held within the class of WCG Banach spaces.…”
Section: Classification Of Smooth Convex Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result was generalized to every Banach space with the help of Bessaga's non-complete norm technique (see the book by Bessaga and Peĺczyński [7]). To get a better insight in the history of the topological classification of convex bodies the reader should also look at the papers by Stocker [25], Corson and Klee [10], and Bessaga and Klee [5,6]. In [15], T. Dobrowolski gave a C p smooth version of that result which held within the class of WCG Banach spaces.…”
Section: Classification Of Smooth Convex Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let hi be defined so that (1) We wish to verify that, in fact, the left product of {A(}(>0 is a /3*-homeomorphism satisfying the conditions of the theorem. Since with r= 1, the conditions of Lemma 2.2 with respect to r, are clearly satisfied using particularly conditions (1), (2), and (5) above, and since conditions (3) and (4) imply that the other hypotheses of Lemma 2.2 are satisfied, then the left product of {A¡}i>0 is a mapping A of 7™ onto itself. To verify that A is a homeomorphism it suffices to note that no two points p and q can be mapped to the same point by h. From conditions (5) and (6) it follows that for some n and all m > n rX(hn-■ -hy(p)) = ry(hm-■ ■ hy(p)) = ry(h(p)) and ri(A"-• hy(q)) = ry(hm-■ hy(q)) = ry(h(q)).…”
Section: Pushing Weakly Thin Sets To £(7oe)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Let {£i}i>0 be any collection of closed sets such that each is weakly thin with respect to a subpartition whose elements are disjoint from a. Then there exists a ß-homeomorphism h such that (1) for p e (°7»\Ui>o Kt), h(p) e °7<°, (2) for any i>0, there is ajt such that h(Ky)^ Wji and (3) a(h) <=«'.…”
Section: Pushing Weakly Thin Sets To £(7oe)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With B denoting the unit ball of E, it is sufficient to demonstrate that K x YiieN Bi is a n¡eN 7írmanifold, for by a theorem of Bessaga and Klee [6] (see note added in proof), each infinite-dimensional Fréchet space is homeomorphic to each of its closed convex bodies. Thus, E is homeomorphic to B and to YJieN Eu so it is homeomorphic to TIíen B¡.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%