2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Everybody stacks: Lessons from household energy case studies to inform design principles for clean energy transitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
83
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Of those households reporting use of LPG for cooking (as either a primary or secondary cooking fuel), four-fifths (81%) used it alongside a polluting solid fuel (wood or charcoal). It is well established that this “fuel stacking” is the norm for many households across SSA, Asia and Latin America [ 34 , 35 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ]. The benefits of clean cooking with LPG are clearly reduced with a greater amount of fuel stacking with solid fuels and kerosene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of those households reporting use of LPG for cooking (as either a primary or secondary cooking fuel), four-fifths (81%) used it alongside a polluting solid fuel (wood or charcoal). It is well established that this “fuel stacking” is the norm for many households across SSA, Asia and Latin America [ 34 , 35 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ]. The benefits of clean cooking with LPG are clearly reduced with a greater amount of fuel stacking with solid fuels and kerosene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Challenges for cleaner cooking intervention development and implementation include the limited consideration for household needs and cultural preferences [ 18 ], unreliable access and financial constraints. These factors may contribute to household ‘stove stacking’ [ 21 ] whereby women continue to use traditional stoves alongside ICS, thus, retaining traditional modes of cooking [ 22 ]. Research across East Africa has highlighted the past failure of policy makers to understand issues around affordability, acceptability and accessibility of solutions [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These settlements suffer from overcrowding, with limited water/sanitation facilities and cooking typically done in a single, multipurpose room. Household energy sources can be variable in these environments outside the context of a pandemic; cooking fuels may be routinely ‘stacked’ (combination of clean and/or polluting fuels) 26,27 or primary fuels switched from clean to polluting fuels (‘reverse switching’) due to unexpected/seasonal changes in income. 28,29 Thus, financial hardship brought about by a mandatory lockdown can potentially spur community-level reverse switching, leading to household PM 2.5 level increases above the World Health Organization (WHO) Indoor Air Quality guidelines, 30,31 which can be intensified by tightly-packed housing, as smoke can infiltrate neighboring homes 32 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%