2019
DOI: 10.1111/ssm.12378
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence‐based reasoning: Eliciting STEM content during engineering design justifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Design is widely regarded as "the essential engineering activity" [18]. The characteristics possessed by the engineering design process as "a method for addressing problems in STEM fields" and the effectiveness of the engineering design serves as a bridge to practical comprehension of STEM content [19]. It has become a requirement to be integrated into the curricula and improve students' problem-solving abilities [20,21].…”
Section: Engineering-based Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design is widely regarded as "the essential engineering activity" [18]. The characteristics possessed by the engineering design process as "a method for addressing problems in STEM fields" and the effectiveness of the engineering design serves as a bridge to practical comprehension of STEM content [19]. It has become a requirement to be integrated into the curricula and improve students' problem-solving abilities [20,21].…”
Section: Engineering-based Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the article by Moore et al 1 the linking research article's title text was incorrect. It should be “Students' use of STEM content in design justifications during engineering design‐based STEM integration”.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designers must communicate across all members of a team in order to establish roles and relationships, plan and change activities, gather and share information, generate and adopt concepts, and avoid and resolve conflict (Cross, 2011). Studies of elementary engineering education illustrate the ways in which young children manage these elements of designing together (Jordan & McDaniel, 2014;Roth, 1996;Moore et al, 2019;Wright et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%