2014
DOI: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2014.499.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for central sensitization in patients with osteoarthritis pain: A systematic literature review

Abstract: Hyperexcitability of the central nervous system (CNS) has been suggested to play an important role in the chronic pain experienced by osteoarthritis (OA) patients. A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was performed to evaluate the existing evidence from the literature related to the presence of central sensitization (CS) in patients with OA.Electronic databases PubMed and Web of Science were searched to identify relevant articles using pre-defined keywords regarding CS and OA. Full-text clinical rep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
258
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 327 publications
(276 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
10
258
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…These results indicate that the mechanism of action is unlikely a masking phenomenon. It has previously been proposed that chronic pain resulting from osteoarthritis of the knee may involve central sensitization [42][43][44]. In the knee osteoarthritis pain study [26] discussed earlier, when subjects were tested for pain pressure thresholds future science group www.futuremedicine.com post-trial, the treatment group demonstrated a significantly higher pain tolerance than the placebo group, both locally and peripherally, indicating a decreased sensitivity to pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These results indicate that the mechanism of action is unlikely a masking phenomenon. It has previously been proposed that chronic pain resulting from osteoarthritis of the knee may involve central sensitization [42][43][44]. In the knee osteoarthritis pain study [26] discussed earlier, when subjects were tested for pain pressure thresholds future science group www.futuremedicine.com post-trial, the treatment group demonstrated a significantly higher pain tolerance than the placebo group, both locally and peripherally, indicating a decreased sensitivity to pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…São igualmente identi icadas as abordagens terapeûticas comportamentais, motoras e farmacológicas para seu tratamento, e a componente de dor neuropática central, induzida pelas modiicações da persistencia de sinal nociceptivo no SNC. 18 Uma revisão sistemática explora a hiperexcitabilidade do SNC nas OA. O fenômeno de sensibilização central tambeḿ pode ser desencadeado pelo componente in lamatório das dores articulares reumáticas.…”
Section: Dor Articular Crônica: Componente Neuropática?unclassified
“…O fenômeno de sensibilização central tambeḿ pode ser desencadeado pelo componente in lamatório das dores articulares reumáticas. O excesso de informação nociceptiva in lamatória promove as alterações plásticas no sistema nervo, amplia o sinal nociceptivo no SNC, tanto pela somação temporal (repetição do estıḿ ulo no tempo) quanto pela somação espacial (estı-mulo nociceptivo proveniente de extensa superfıć ie somá- 5,18 tica) da dor. A sensibilização pode ocorrer ao nıv el espinhal, assim como nas vias de inibição descendente (tronco cerebral), pela precária ativação no mecanismo antinociceptivo, pela excitabilidade da neuromatriz da dor no córtex cerebral ou pela potencialização neuronal no cór-18 tex cingulado anterior.…”
Section: Dor Articular Crônica: Componente Neuropática?unclassified
“…One reason why the financial burden of musculoskeletal pain is enormous is that there is no definitive treatment for chronic or persistent pain conditions [5]. In acute pain states, pain typically correlates with pathobiological changes in peripheral tissues, whilst recent studies demonstrated that central sensitisation in spinal cord and brain might have larger role in the production of pain in chronic pain states [6][7][8][9]. This evidence questions the validity of traditional biomedical model, in which symptoms are thought to be explained by pathobiological damage to local tissues [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%