2008
DOI: 10.1162/ling.2008.39.4.589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for Morphoprosodic Alignment in Reduplication

Abstract: Morphoprosodic Alignment (MPA) is a nontemplatic model of reduplication designed to account for languages with multiple reduplicative subpatterns. The premise of MPA is that reduplicative morphemes can be stem-internal or stem-external and that this distinction is visible to the phonological component through general constraints on the association of stem-internal and stem-external morphemes to prosodic categories. I illustrate the model with Moronene, Klamath, and Gooniyandi, each of which has several redupli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The situation at hand differs from other languages such as Kosraean, a Micronesian the language spoken on the island of Kosrae, in the Eastern Caroline Islands (Kennedy, 2008). The language prefix VC element in reduplication involving polysyllabic vowel-initial roots, which is described as syllabified by itself (Kennedy, 2008). Intervocalic environments emerge as a result of the formation is unhindered.…”
Section: ) Onset-maximisationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The situation at hand differs from other languages such as Kosraean, a Micronesian the language spoken on the island of Kosrae, in the Eastern Caroline Islands (Kennedy, 2008). The language prefix VC element in reduplication involving polysyllabic vowel-initial roots, which is described as syllabified by itself (Kennedy, 2008). Intervocalic environments emerge as a result of the formation is unhindered.…”
Section: ) Onset-maximisationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Surprisingly, the vowels within the polysyllabic vowelinitial roots are syllabified independently without, defying the norms of the universal preferencesto maximise the vowel as the onset. (Kennedy, 2008) Kosraean seemed to be flexible with word-medial vowel syllable in reduplications, but Tamil prefers otherwise. It adopts the universal preferences, where all syllable must begin with consonant word-medially.…”
Section: ) Onset-maximisationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is also observed in dialects such as Beijing Mandarin, Taiwanese, and Dongshi Hakka, as illustrated in (25), where highlights realization of an input floating tone in the output. 8 Interested readers are referred to Yip (1990) for a floating tone analysis regarding adjective reduplication in Beijing Mandarin, to Cheng (1973) and Zhang & Lai (2007, 2008 for a floating tone analysis pertaining to double reduplication in Taiwanese monosyllabic adjectives, and to Lin (2011) for a floating tone analysis within Dongshi Hakka special reduplication. 25Consider now the second characteristic of special tone sandhi.…”
Section: Optimality Theoretic Analysis Of Special Tone Sandhi In Redumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, because there is no systematic semantic functional distinction among the four reduplication patterns the reduplicative morphemes in the four patterns are considered as root controlled and the alternations in the size and placement of the reduplicants are allomorphic. The allomorphic alternations in size and placement of Chengdu reduplication can be accounted for by the morphoprosodic alignment (MPA) model, which was proposed by Kennedy (2008) to account for morphological alternations. According to MPA, reduplicative affixes may be stem-internal or stem-external; stem-internal affixes are separated from the base by a + boundary (i.e.…”
Section: An Optimality Theoretic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the syntactic and semantic representations do not develop in parallel with the mapping between them (Muskens, 2001). Another finding is that the acquisition age of recursive structures across languages differs, which is explained by parametrical factors such as the overtness of morphosyntactic markers (Di Sciullo, 2015;Sevcenco et al, 2017) and by language-general factors such as the interface of different levels of linguistic representations (Kennedy, 2008;Roeper & Diego, 2020, in preparation;Yang et al, 2021). Unlike possessives, generics are used to express the mapping of form-referent qualities that are relatively essential, enduring, and timeless (Lyons, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%