1993
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)31429-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for multiple binding sites for several components of human lymphoblastoid interferon-alpha

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported, for example, that IFN “consensus” has a higher affinity for the IFN receptor than IFN-α2 or IFN-α8 (), and several studies have shown that the antiviral activity of IFN-cons is higher than that of IFN-α2 or IFN-α8 ( , ). Moreover, Hu et al ( , ) ranked various IFN-α subtypes in terms of antiproliferative activity. The interaction of IFN-α8 and IFN-β with the human type I IFN receptors was evaluated from the distribution of their electrostatic potentials and an analysis of the binding surfaces on IFN-α2 for human IFNAR1 and IFNAR2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported, for example, that IFN “consensus” has a higher affinity for the IFN receptor than IFN-α2 or IFN-α8 (), and several studies have shown that the antiviral activity of IFN-cons is higher than that of IFN-α2 or IFN-α8 ( , ). Moreover, Hu et al ( , ) ranked various IFN-α subtypes in terms of antiproliferative activity. The interaction of IFN-α8 and IFN-β with the human type I IFN receptors was evaluated from the distribution of their electrostatic potentials and an analysis of the binding surfaces on IFN-α2 for human IFNAR1 and IFNAR2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies have investigated the bioactivities of the various IFNα subtypes in a comprehensive manner (Lavoie et al, 2011), and it has been posited that the clinical utility of IFNα has been restricted by a lack of understanding of the differences between the subtypes (Gibbert et al, 2013). Although recombinant cytokines and engineered variants have been instrumental in revealing key differences in binding and bioactivity (Hu et al, 1993;Blatt et al, 1996;Brideau-Andersen et al, 2007;Kalie et al, 2007), a panel of recombinant antibodies with validated subtype specificities could provide a means of assessing IFNα subtype levels and activities in biological samples. For diseases in which type I IFNs are known to play a role (Hooks et al, 1979;Banchereau and Pascual, 2006;Higgs et al, 2011;Crow, 2014), such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, these tools could provide insight in to disease pathoetiology and potential therapeutic strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is known that the various IFNα subtypes exhibit cell- (Hiscott et al, 1984;Nyman et al, 1998;Easlick et al, 2010) and ligand-dependent expression patterns (Hillyer et al, 2012), widely varying potencies (Moll et al, 2011), and potentially divergent activities (Ortaldo et al, 1984;Hu et al, 1993;Langer, 2007), a detailed understanding of their individual roles in the pathology of disease is lacking. Recent studies highlight this void by confirming the role of IFNα in a variety of autoimmune disorders (Burman et al, 1985;Imagawa et al, 1995;Atkinson and Eisenbarth, 2001;Blanco et al, 2001;Nestle et al, 2005;Li et al, 2008;Baccala et al, 2012;Asgari et al, 2013;Ferreira et al, 2014), and suggesting that individual subtypes potentially play a role in the development of human disease (Hirankarn et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous results showed that hybrid IFNs with N-terminal portion derived from IFN-α21b competed poorly with IFN-α2b for cellular binding ( , ). CM3 is one of these hybrids, and also has a mutation in helix C (Y86K).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type I IFNs bind with distinct affinities to the common type I IFN receptor complex (IFNAR), expressed on the surface of target cells in low numbers (100−5000 molecules/cell) ( ). Functional human IFNAR is a heterodimeric complex composed of two transmembrane polypeptide chains, IFNAR1 and IRNAR2, with distinct complementary functions, which associate to form a heterodimer upon IFN-binding ( , ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%