2011
DOI: 10.1037/a0024256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for selective inhibitory impairment in individuals with autism spectrum disorder.

Abstract: Taken together, the present findings indicate that ASD is associated with impairments in some, but not all, aspects of inhibitory control. Individuals with ASD appear to have difficulty ignoring distracting visual information, but prepotent response inhibition and resistance to proactive interference are relatively intact. The current findings also provide support for a multitype model of inhibitory control.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
107
1
13

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
3
107
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…In the version adapted for children (Christ, Kester, Bodner, & Miles, 2011), five fish were presented in one row and participants were instructed to pay attention to the orientation (right or left) of the central fish (target). The other fish were oriented either in the same direction (congruent stimulus) or in the opposite direction (incongruent stimulus).…”
Section: Flanker Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the version adapted for children (Christ, Kester, Bodner, & Miles, 2011), five fish were presented in one row and participants were instructed to pay attention to the orientation (right or left) of the central fish (target). The other fish were oriented either in the same direction (congruent stimulus) or in the opposite direction (incongruent stimulus).…”
Section: Flanker Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this brief evaluation of the intelligence procedure is in line with other studies in the area (Christ et al, 2011;Geurts et al, 2004). This choice is justified by the fact that a full IQ evaluation battery substantially increases the time taken to make the evaluation, with possible implications for the performance of the clinical group, such as fatigue and stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In the inhibitory control, the executive component related to the ability to inhibit stimuli, irrelevant impulses or distractors (Barkley, 2001), there is also evidence of significant impairments when individuals with ASD are compared to those with typical development (Chan et al, 2009;Christ, Holt, White, & Green, 2007;Christ, Kester, Bodner, & Miles, 2011;Robinson et al, 2009). In this study, impairments in inhibitory control were observed in the ASD group, in the Stroop Test (score of color-word interference), in the Auditory go/no go task, in the verbal fluency tasks (inhibition of all words of the lexicon that comes to mind and that do not fulfilling the criterion requested by the examiner), and in Part B of the Trail Making Test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, while the simultaneous presentation of the three stimuli did reduce memory constraints, it might appeal more strongly to the ability to shift attention. As individuals with ASD often show difficulty shifting attention (e.g., Landry and Bryson 2004;Plaisted et al 1999; for a review see Keehn et al 2013), disengaging attention (Landry and Bryson 2004) or filtering out irrelevant distracters (Burack 1994;Christ et al 2011;Plaisted et al 1999), more targets on the screen can induce more errors or slower response times in the ASD group compared to performance on the original task. More targets on the screen can also reduce the salience of the individual targets and therefore alter perceptual processing, since enhanced perceptual processing in individuals with ASD has been related to enhanced saliency of stimulus features (Plaisted et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%