2010
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0912245107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for widespread adaptive evolution of gene expression in budding yeast

Abstract: Changes in gene expression have been proposed to underlie many, or even most, adaptive differences between species. Despite the increasing acceptance of this view, only a handful of cases of adaptive gene expression evolution have been demonstrated. To address this discrepancy, we introduce a simple test for lineage-specific selection on gene expression. Applying the test to genome-wide gene expression data from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , we find that hundreds of gene … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
187
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
10
187
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all 66 of these SNPs, the rarer allele resulted in a faster death rate (increased sensitivity to ER stress) (Dataset S5). This observation implies that natural selection is a likely factor driving the distribution of allelic effects (24,25). Seven of the 66 SNPs are nonsynonymous coding changes in Xbp1 (1 SNP), Megator (1 SNP), CG33339 (4 SNPs), and CG11873 (1 SNP) (Dataset S5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all 66 of these SNPs, the rarer allele resulted in a faster death rate (increased sensitivity to ER stress) (Dataset S5). This observation implies that natural selection is a likely factor driving the distribution of allelic effects (24,25). Seven of the 66 SNPs are nonsynonymous coding changes in Xbp1 (1 SNP), Megator (1 SNP), CG33339 (4 SNPs), and CG11873 (1 SNP) (Dataset S5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the directionality of the outcome of any perturbation of genes in a network such as whether the perturbation will raise or lower a phenotypic outcome depends on the genetic background and environmental conditions due to complex network feedbacks (Davey Smith and Ebrahim 2003;Chen et al 2008). Last but not least, confounding effects from pleiotropy and LD can complicate causality inference, and the interpretation of causality results can be further complicated by factors such as morphogenic stability, developmental adaptation, and canalization (Davey Smith and Ebrahim 2003;Schadt et al 2005;Fraser et al 2010). Therefore, some of the conclusions should be interpreted with care, and more follow-up studies are needed to test the hypothesis put forward.…”
Section: à5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies indicate that the architecture of biological networks is conserved through evolution (24)(25)(26), suggesting that the overall wiring diagram may be somewhat robust to changes in the contexts. If so, context-dependent risk variants will more likely induce changes to the network activity potentially by increasing or decreasing the number of edges and nodes in the network, thereby perturbing the molecular processes and biological functions defined by that network.…”
Section: Defining Inherited Risk Dependent On Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%