2001
DOI: 10.1179/jwa.2001.1.1.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence from marine crannogs of later prehistoric use of the Firth of Clyde

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with a number of studies and Fig. 9 A summary diagram of the biological proxies and stratigraphic data used in the Lough Kinale-Derragh Lough study area excavations of crannogs which have revealed wheat straw (Hencken 1950), carbonized oats and barley (Collins 1955;Raftery 1957;Crone 2002), wild plants such as blackberry, raspberry and elderberries (Crone 2002;Fredengren 2002), and domesticated animals (Sands and Hale 2001). The different diatom assemblages from the three cores are best explained by the proximity to human settlement within each lacustrine cell, with Ballywillin Crannog core being closest to human activity after the construction of the crannog and the lower Lough Kinale core being farthest away from any human activity on either crannogs or the lake shores.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Coressupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This is in agreement with a number of studies and Fig. 9 A summary diagram of the biological proxies and stratigraphic data used in the Lough Kinale-Derragh Lough study area excavations of crannogs which have revealed wheat straw (Hencken 1950), carbonized oats and barley (Collins 1955;Raftery 1957;Crone 2002), wild plants such as blackberry, raspberry and elderberries (Crone 2002;Fredengren 2002), and domesticated animals (Sands and Hale 2001). The different diatom assemblages from the three cores are best explained by the proximity to human settlement within each lacustrine cell, with Ballywillin Crannog core being closest to human activity after the construction of the crannog and the lower Lough Kinale core being farthest away from any human activity on either crannogs or the lake shores.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Coressupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The close proximity of the terminus of the Antonine Wall (the northernmost Roman fortification in Britain) and the potential association of wetland sites with Roman material culture elsewhere in Scotland (Hunter 1994) have led some to posit that the Clyde crannogs were associated with the Roman occupation of Scotland (e.g. Sands and Hale 2002). If this was indeed the case, the interaction with the occupier could be one of the motives behind building these sites and ought to be taken into account whenever discussing the data derived from them.…”
Section: Case Study: the Clyde Crannogsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legacy radiocarbon determinations from Dumbuck and Erskine Bridge crannogs visualized against the timing of the construction of the Antonine Wall, Agricola's invasion of Scotland and the settlement "event" happening around 200 cal BC. Data fromSands and Hale (2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there is a degree of structural variability in the estuarine sites that perhaps warns against categorizing them as one site type. Munro himself had doubts about categorizing the site at Dumbuck as a ‘crannog’ (Munro 1905, 133; Sands and Hale 2001, 47), yet it has certainly been demonstrated that there are a range of lake dwelling sites in Scotland that do not conform closely to what constituted Munro's definition of a ‘crannog’. Sands and Hale's justification (2001, 47) of the label may leave room for inclusiveness, but, as they argue, there are obvious reasons for including the estuarine sites reported by Hale as closely related to the overall ‘lake’ dwelling theme in Scotland.…”
Section: Scotlandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sands and Hale (2001, 50) consider that the range of estuarine dates in the Late Bronze and Earlier Iron Ages is due to an accident of preservation, and that other similar sites from earlier and later periods have been lost owing to changes in river patterns. While it is impossible to disprove this contention, this chronological range sits well in the context of a late first millennium BC crannog construction horizon, evident in both the Highlands and the south‐west of Scotland, and it is perhaps unsurprising that the estuarine sites seem to be firmly located in this chronological range.…”
Section: Scotlandmentioning
confidence: 99%