Evidence from Patents and Patent Citations on the Impact of NASA and Other Federal Labs on Commercial Innovation

Abstract

Federal lab commercialization is explored: (1) by analyzing US government patents and (2) in a qualitative analysis of one NASA lab’s patents. Tests apply to three distinct sets of patents, 1963–94: NASA, all other US government, and a random sample of all US inventors’ patents. The federal patenting rate plummeted in the 1970s. Consistent with increasing commercialization, both NASA’s and other federal agencies’ rates recovered in the 1980s. The case study finds citations to be a valid but noisy measure of technology spillovers. Excluding ‘spurious’ cites, two‐thirds of cites to patents of NASA‐Lewis’ Electro‐Physics Branch were evaluated as involving spillovers.

University spillovers and new business location in high-technology sectors: Spanish evidence

“…For instance, Thursby and Thursby (2003) discussed several ways in which firms identify universities' technologies, one of which involves personal contacts between the firm's R&D staff and university personnel. Second, the literature on patent citations as a flow of knowledge between inventors is consistent with the importance of proximity in fostering spillovers (Jaffe et al 1998). Therefore, we propose to examine the relevance of the sources of spillovers by testing the following hypotheses.…”

What affects a patent’s value? An analysis of variables that affect technological, direct economic, and indirect economic value: An exploratory conceptual approach

“…The technological value of a patent can be captured through a patent citation count [JAFFE & AL., 1998;GAY & AL., 2005;LEE & AL., 2007]. The more often a patent has been cited, the more technologically important it is, as that means it is playing significant roles in succeeding innovations.…”

An in-depth empirical analysis of patent citation counts using zero-inflated count data model: The case of KIST

“…By analyzing the patent data, researchers have showed geographical knowledge flow, especially international knowledge flow across countries (JAFFE et al, 1993;JAFFE & TRAJTENBERG, 1999). Researchers also investigated the spill-over impacts of individual research institutes (JAFFE et al, 1998), various policy and management implications on innovation systems (MEYER, 2002), institutional relations (MEYER et al, 2003), and knowledge transfer and diffusion (CHEN & HICKS, 2004). Moreover, several studies assessed the relationship between science and technology by using non-patent citation data in US patent MEYER, 2000b;TIJSSEN, 2001TIJSSEN, , 2002.…”